You can view the page at http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/content.php/6124-Farmer-stopped-from-recapturing-crocodiles
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
But the river naturally has crocodiles in it?Yeah he can't prove ownership, but surely it would be better to get a few thousand out of the damn river... and he can hold them until ownership is proven.
Yeah he can't prove ownership, but surely it would be better to get a few thousand out of the damn river... and he can hold them until ownership is proven.
Huh? So if you have a game-farm with 1000 springbok and half escape because of a freak natural event, you can simply grab a coupla hundred from an open space and claim they're yours?
But the river naturally has crocodiles in it?
Yeah it could have disasterous effects on the ecology of the area. He should have had them tagged.
So he cant be held responsible if someone is injured or killed by a crocodile in that area
The victim would also have to prove that it was one of the farmers crocs"They told us we weren't allowed to capture crocodiles from the Limpopo River before we're given permission, because we can't prove ownership of the animals."
Yeah, but the point is that if he can't prove ownership he can't just bag the ones he captures - because they naturally occur there.Yes, but a certain number, not a certain number + a few thousand extra.
Yeah, but the point is that if he can't prove ownership he can't just bag the ones he captures - because they naturally occur there.
Yeah, but the point is that if he can't prove ownership he can't just bag the ones he captures - because they naturally occur there.
Who really gives a fsck, if he had 1000 crocs on his farm and recovered 1000 from the river does it really matter? At the end of the day there is 1000 less crocs in the river. Is it really such an issue that he might recover a croc that's not from his farm?