iBurst tower battle heats up
Information related to recently erected iBurst tower raises questions about objections
Information related to recently erected iBurst tower raises questions about objections
iBurst further said that her allegation that the mast impacts on the commercial value of her property is incorrect and that the property valuer’s report states that the mast has no impact on property values.
If you want good signal, buy a few houses down the lane, not right next to the bloody thing!
I have friends who have iBurst, what is their reception like? - Excellent.
Does it work well? -NO! Excellent as in your 95% to 100%. I have been through this a 100 times on the forum. That is quantity not quality.
PM me for instructions in signal finding.
And then you want to offer them wired services but the cable must not go under THEIR driveway or pavement.Nothing can be done about the bad signal so then they complain a bit more
MyBB, nothing else to report on?
Are you serious? We got a new member bcos of this article
I am also a Craigavon resident that has not been informed properly about the erection of the iBurst tower. It is extremely unsightly and as many of the other residents I am just as concerned about the health issues and devaluation of our properties.
what health issuses? clearly your are not a iburst subscriber.
So if you're not an iBurst subscriber you're not allowed to bitch about the towers?
It is unsightly yes...but the BTS has to go somewhere. No BTS no signal. U see this very often, specially with Vodacom and im sure with MTN too. They want to erect a new BTS because people complaining about bad signal. Then the people reject it cause they dont want BTS close to them. Nothing can be done about the bad signal so then they complain a bit more
no by all means, i don't personally like iburst at all, but it's just strange the way people complain sometime.
@ xrapdx......if you have any kind of wireless device, cellphone or modem....then NO....you are not allowed to bitch! (kidding) hehe