Just because people benefited from Apartheid does not make them advantaged. I'm white, I grew up in the 80's, I went to a governement school (at my parent's expense) and there is no way I was advantaged. My folks worked their wrinkly a55es off to put me through school, to clothe me, to see to it that I had a decent upbringing, but they had to scrimp and save and sacrifice one hell of a lot of things to ensure their kids got a decent beginning in life. In that way yes I was advantaged, my parents wanted to give us a good grounding in life so we could make successes of our lives. It had sweet **** all to do with apartheid. My parents were first generation South Africans, who came to South Africa in the 70's not because it was anti black or because of the governments policies but because South Africa was one of the most prosperous countries in the world at the time.
I believe there is a particular race on MYBB that think because they are of a particular race that they are entitled to everything the white man had during apartheid, regardless of whether the means by which they get this is racist or not. You can only go on blaming Apartheid for so long before people start getting bored of hearing this god awful excuse. In the beginning yes I'd agree apartheid had a lot to answer for and was rightly blamed but jeezuz wept 15 years after it was abolished we're getting people who weren't even around during apartheid blaming apartheid for things. If you went to school and your education was not sufficient take it up with the ruling party, not the "previously advantaged".
I may stand corrected here history was not one of my strong points at school. Apartheid "began" in 1948 which means it was around for about 46 years as a legal entity. (Yes I know there was discrimination before then however blame the actual countries that were colonial masters, not the residents). Apartheid has been gone since 94 which means it's been gone approximately 15 years which is a third of the length of the time it was around. Have things actually improved by a third? IMO no.
BS! A child in 94 will have been of a school going age 2000/2001 that's six years AFTER apartheid was effed, while his parents may not have been as wealthy as a Sandton resident (Mine weren't either just btw) he was or at least should have received the same education and rights as the Sandton kid. If people take umberance (sp) at that send a letter to the ANC or even better stop voting for the ****ers. Those people in Sandton worked for their money, my folks who worked too didn't have the same opportunities as they did to get wealthy. Should I blame apartheid for not letting my family be as rich as them? No... Aaaah shame you walked to campus, I used to have to catch the train because even though I was working part time around my studies I could never have afforded a car. My parents could not do so either do you know why? Because they were paying a loan off for me to attend Uni. I owned my first car here in the UK almost 10 years after finishing matric, and it wasn't brand new and it only cost ÂŁ100 which I had to save for. Get a second job and work towards your goals.
Members(Not all) of a particular race group shoud really get over themselves, BBE/AA is here to stay and address the imbalances of the past.
[/qote]
Members of a particular race group should get over themselves and try understanding why members of another race group have issues with these policies. They don't affect me however they rile me up. I've said it before, AA in the UK is existant and guess what? It's fine. Why? Because people that are non-white are in the MINORITY in this country. I can live with that, however I will never return to SA when these policies exist. It is racism, the majority is hindering the progress of the minority. It's a viscious circle, while addressing the imbalances of the past you are alienating and discriminating against people who had bugger all to do with apartheid. Will there be AA/WEEE in 25 years time when these peoples children will actually have been disadvantaged because they could not get a job? I'm guessing no...
The general consensus amongst the majority of the world population is that politicians are corrupt. Why? Because they prove us right time after time. Look at the expenses row here in the U.K at the moment. The general consensus of the majority of the world's population is that communism may not be all that great. Why? Well look throughout history, look at the human rights abuses in China etc. Now to my point. Yes I'm willing to bet that the majority of a particular race thinks that black men in high position is for show, it's blatantly evident in so many places so it's the norm. To find a "black man in a high place" who is there for the benefit of the company is the exception not the norm. Also dear sir you will find that people of all races find this. If we don't like the heat do what others have done? What exactly do you mean by this? Do you mean leave the country? Fortunately I'm not there anymore so I've "already done what these people should do". But if that's what you are saying then sir you are the one that needs a big ****ing wake up call.
Yes people have a right to be bitter and a right to wake up feeling so, but there's a particular race, while they deserve to feel bitter, are bitter and are making the previously advantaged pay for it. Even those who had nothing to do with apartheid. How is that fair?
Nice... +1
People seem to forget that our parents who were the guys behind Apartheid worked their A$$es off to make a living... Dude, my parents were NOT advantaged and my dad had to crawl on his hands and knees to earn the life we had.
I had to work hard at school as it was expected of me.