South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'm sure the Android and Apple numbers would shoot up if the SP's provided an agnostic "uncapped" mobile broadband product.
If they offered a 256kbps service (you don't really need any faster to download emails and browse Facebook on a phone) specifically for smartphones for R79, then they would most certainly see huge movement in the numbers of subscribers using the service.
Let's face it, people only do the Blackberry thing for it's "uncapped" internet.
Edit: Although I dont understand why they are comapring 2 manufacturers to an OS. Seems to skew the numbers in favour of Android.
For me its who delivers the best hardware for my OS, not "I am stuck with RIM hardware because I want to use BIS"
Because OEM's like Samsung and HTC dont only make Android phones. Samsung for example have Microsoft, BADA and Android phones.
Also the fact that Android users are not brand loyal I guess, seeing that most would switch from HTC to Samsung to Motorola without thinking twice. For me its who delivers the best hardware for my OS, not "I am stuck with RIM hardware because I want to use BIS"
I can understand why Android devices are not selling well on Vodacom, their normal contract don't come with any decent data and their top-ups are grossly over priced.
Then surely this should have been showing products? i.e
Blackberry, iPhone, Samsung Galaxy, Motorolla Droid, etc
It's not about this, that or the other. It is about the combination of things. The company that offers the best combination of the things most important to end-users will outsell their competitors. BlackBerry does best in SA because in the South African realities RIM offers the best combination of those things that matters most to South African consumers. It is up to the competitors to come up with a better combination ... but SA is such an insignificant blip on their radars that they don't really care.
We can argue here for forever-and-a-day and not change market forces. The majority of buyers get what they believe to be the best solution from RIM in collaboration with the networks. The geek stuff we care about doesn't matter to them. There's more to consumer choices than the best spec sheets (many engineers fail to appreciate this).
This is a good direction you are thinking along. So allow me to take it a little further.BIS-like service for other smart phones will kill BB in weeks
If all other makes, like Samsung, HTC, Apple, Nokia, LG, Alcatel and the lot all told the networks they want their own virtual ISP network on top of the mobile network can you image what a nightmare that would be? It simply is not possible, and if it is not possible for all then it should not be possible for one.
Again, it does not have to be - but the network will NEVER allow all the other phone makers to do the same as BB. And RIM is not going to allow traffic from other phone makers on their network. At the same time their network is dying.WHY must this service be brand specific?
WHY can't - I mean WON'T Vodacom/MTN/8ta/Virgin/ETC offer a service like BIS for ALL brands?
WHY must this service be brand specific?
WHY can't - I mean WON'T Vodacom/MTN/8ta/Virgin/ETC offer a service like BIS for ALL brands?