South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.






























I would imagine there's a much lower failure rate overall.Opinion: why do manufacturers insist on using screens instead of buttons?
Nostalgic for the days of buttons instead of touchscreens? You're not alone
Here we go again. I’m sitting with a car interface designer and being told that I’m too old, and that what I want isn’t what customers want. This time it’s a BMW engineer, and it’s the new operating system being rolled out on the iX and i4. Today’s customers, she tells me, want everything to be on the screen. It’s only a few old buffers like me who want physical switches for the climate controls or stereo or driver assist.
With a weary sigh, I ask why. Like I always ask why. Because, comes the answer, as the answer always comes, because customers use tablets and phones and they like it and they’re good at it. At which point, once again, my voice rises to a near-hysterical scream. What is good for an iPad, I plead, is not what is good for a car.
At home I drink my coffee out of little glass espresso cups. They hold the heat and let me check I’ve pulled a good shot with a decent crema. If I’m drinking coffee in the car, I use a plastic vessel with a lid and just a small drinking hole. Because at 70mph or on a bumpy road, the combination of glass and open hot liquid is bound to end badly. Same with controlling the car’s functions. A screen is essentially non-tactile and you jab at it with your finger.
![]()
Opinion: why do manufacturers insist on using screens instead of buttons?
Nostalgic for the days of buttons instead of touchscreens? You're not alonewww.topgear.com