Brazil vs Ivory Coast

Was looking foward to watching K A K A play in Friday. Now he will be banned.
 
Unfair?It was ridiculous, just a nudge in the chest and the player holds his head like he was punched.
IMO, soccer needs some replays, the referee was "fooled" into giving the card and he probably didn't see the incident clearly.
Bring in monitoring, it will save time that is wasted by players complaining and "acting" and will make the game more fair - I go to a match to watch players play football, not to complain
all day and think they are gods.Ridiculous I say.

+1 I thought that if the Ref didn't see it he couldn't make a call on it since he might be wrongly influenced by a player. Seems like the rules changed at some point.:mad:
 
When did ref start asking players for their opinions? Keita is my enemy no 1. K A K A is my favourite player.
 
Where can we find a list of the referees, and there games which they have called in the world cup? Just so I know what to expect from them in the next game
 
***a had just been cautioned, he was moving slowly and never made an attempt to move out of the way of the running player (who he looks at in the replay). He deliberately put his elbow into the other player's chest, but still, he HAD just been cautioned about that. Did the CIV player make a meal of it? Completely. Was ***a completely innocent? Never in a million years.
 
***a had just been cautioned, he was moving slowly and never made an attempt to move out of the way of the running player (who he looks at in the replay). He deliberately put his elbow into the other player's chest, but still, he HAD just been cautioned about that. Did the CIV player make a meal of it? Completely. Was ***a completely innocent? Never in a million years.

***a just put his arm out to soften the blow. No ways he elbowed Keita.
 
So if a player runs towards you, you step aside to let him pass? Ka ka was looking the other way. Keita wa looking at ka ka when he ran into him.
 
***a had just been cautioned, he was moving slowly and never made an attempt to move out of the way of the running player (who he looks at in the replay). He deliberately put his elbow into the other player's chest, but still, he HAD just been cautioned about that. Did the CIV player make a meal of it? Completely. Was ***a completely innocent? Never in a million years.

You must be the type that get's convinced by soapies :D
Keita should've got the card btw :erm:
 
Last edited:
Besides Keita should have been sent off with that tackle on Bastos. CIV played a very rough game from the start.
 
You must be the type that get's convinced by soapies :D
Keita should've got the card btw :erm:

Totally, I think they should never have killed JR. :)
Cookie-dough (they keep censoring my posts ok?) provoked an action. You can't tell me he was innocent. He made contact when he should have made way.
 
Now I wonder if Korea DPR could make it 3rd or even 2nd!:wtf:
I think the result should've been 2-1 to Brazil, I'm not disappointed that ICoast lost anyway.
I wonder if there'll be any draw backs to refereeing with technology, besides eliminating "actors" and illegal goals/decisions etc.
 
Totally, I think they should never have killed JR. :)
Cookie-dough (they keep censoring my posts ok?) provoked an action. You can't tell me he was innocent. He made contact when he should have made way.

The player ran into ***a and the ball was no where near them!!:whistle:
You must be blind, and support I Coast in everything they do.

Don't you get it...this type of acting is bad for Soccer!
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X