Is it safe to assume none of you okes in Ruby are gonna go with Vodacom then? I'm definitely not. If none of us do - where does that leave Vodacom? Forced to change the package options or re-sell again to another company? Hoping for the latter, so that Frogfoot or Afrihost can take it...
Honestly, Vodacom is big enough to just not care... It's not like they need the revenue - this is small change for them. I don't think they will give a damn in terms of who signs and who doesn't. This is a fight the HOA would need to fight I think, and depending on contracts I doubt that they'll get anywhere. I can see Vodacom (and others) dragging this out for many, many years. You can try the ISPA, but I'm not sure on what grounds they will intervene, as even the ISPA's code of conduct, does not have any provisions in terms of infrastructure, only services. The FTTH Council of South Africa may have something to say, but it is not a legal body with any authority either, so they can't force anything onto anyone either.
EC
NS license holders, are for a lack of a better word, free to do as they please. That's the biggest problem here. They are doing exactly what we've accused Telkom of doing for many, many years. We just happen to turn a blind eye to it because we're so happy that it's not Telkom doing it. That, doesn't make it right. Think about Local Loop Unbundling, and how we're STILL no where near it? Ironic, how it all just went quiet, and swept under the carpet? These same companies that faught Telkom on LLU, are now doing precisely the same thing.
We need regulations to
force LLU on the FTTx game (or any infrastructure for that matter), it's the only way. FTTx providers are installing the Local Loop (fiber) and doing absolutely everything in their power, to refuse anyone access to the actual Local Loop. They resell access to the local loop in a very, very similar way to what Telkom is reselling IPC. Sure, cheaper perhaps, but it's fundamentally the exact same model (and that's now IF you can get them to sell you the access). They are operating no differently to what Telkom is, and was, 5, 10, 20 years ago. We are here, and we're not allowing any one else to enter our "turf."
Just look at the old SADV, in Century City for example (and other estates that they have and/or had), even before the FTTx boom. They would even back in the day refuse the likes of Telkom to just install a DSL line in a building where they had "exclusivity" (search this very forum, multiple posts about SADV nightmares).
I'm not sure what the industry is going to do about this as a whole, but regulation is needed if this is how the "big boys" are playing (again, ISPA and/or Competition Commission perhaps, is a good start). Stories like this is very quickly going to give the entire industry a bad name I'm afraid - it breaks down confidence in the technologies used, it breaks down trust in allowing operators to install private infrastructure, and it scares customers and HOAs away from entering into agreements... Even Municipalities, needs to start realizing what is happening here, and wake up in terms of conditions imposed on wayleaves. CoCT told me personally in so many words, they just can not and don't know how, to get these guys to S-H-A-R-E.
I know of at least 5 trustees on various HOAs, reading this very thread, to be honest.