Cell C wants even playing field

I ask again why on-network calls are not R1.25 cheaper than off-network calls? :rolleyes:

This proves yet again that other organisations have more balls than ICASA in an area that ICASA should have regulated a long time ago.
 
In the meantime, South African cellphone users will continue to pay higher prices than most other countries in the world.

Five years from now they will be writing the same thing. Sigh. It bums me out quite a bit...
 
Deteriorating

And still my (end others I know of) MNT voice service has deteriorated badly over the last few months..... Looks like government is running (and making prices at) the cellular providers.:mad:
 
I don't see how the 3G networks are an issue. I'm sure they're mainly used for data anyway, can't think of anyone that actually uses video calling. Cell C just uses any opportunity to try and turn their weakness in not rolling out 3G into some sort of advantage.
 
I ask again why on-network calls are not R1.25 cheaper than off-network calls? :rolleyes:

This proves yet again that other organisations have more balls than ICASA in an area that ICASA should have regulated a long time ago.

spot on
ICASA finalised their hearings more than 2 years ago and have done squat

the highest in the world = nothing short of another disgraceful indictment of the incompetence and greed abounding in govt, the regulator and industry while the consumer - rich and poor, urban and rural, serviced and under-serviced - gets screwed
 
spot on
ICASA finalised their hearings more than 2 years ago and have done squat

the highest in the world = nothing short of another disgraceful indictment of the incompetence and greed abounding in govt, the regulator and industry while the consumer - rich and poor, urban and rural, serviced and under-serviced - gets screwed

Makes me so angry these evil people are allowed to be in power :(
 
I don't see how the 3G networks are an issue. I'm sure they're mainly used for data anyway, can't think of anyone that actually uses video calling. Cell C just uses any opportunity to try and turn their weakness in not rolling out 3G into some sort of advantage.

Because like the article says, forking out R 2 Billion takes its fair share of time to receive back in earnings, especially if you're like Cell C which only now, after 7 years, has made a paltry R 321M in profit (that's after all expenditures and liabilities are deducted).

At that rate, if they were to roll out a 3G network now, without any further expansion or growth whatsoever it would take Cell C around 6 years to return to profitability.

Now you say that the construction of a 3G network doesn't play a role. :P
 
Because like the article says, forking out R 2 Billion takes its fair share of time to receive back in earnings, especially if you're like Cell C which only now, after 7 years, has made a paltry R 321M in profit (that's after all expenditures and liabilities are deducted).

At that rate, if they were to roll out a 3G network now, without any further expansion or growth whatsoever it would take Cell C around 6 years to return to profitability.

Now you say that the construction of a 3G network doesn't play a role. :P

That assumes that the 3G network won't bring in any revenue, which MTN and VC especially disprove. They're implying that 3G networks are being cross subsidised by interconnect costs which I haven't seen any evidence of.
 
i am not buying any justification for a 500% increase shortly before a new competitor is licensed

prime example of ICASA's powerlessness - it's like a drive-by mugging in front of police headquarters which everyone knows about but doesn't really seem to care that the end-product is extortionate call rates distorted by interconnection rates which have NOTHING to do with cost + a reasonable rate of return and everything to do with anti-competitive oligarchic predation

and they shamelessly defend it to the hilt in the name of future investment
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X