China - Taiwan Developments

How is that morally correct ?
A word ?
Whats China ?
Whats Taiwan ?
China is a dictatorship
Taiwan is a democracy
If you can't discern the moral difference between the two, then am not sure there is anything I can say to convince you.
 
China is a dictatorship
Taiwan is a democracy
If you can't discern the moral difference between the two, then am not sure there is anything I can say to convince you.
The Constitution of the People's Republic of China (PRC) states that its form of government is "people's democratic dictatorship". The Constitution also holds that China is a one-party state that is governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

They used the word.
Now you need to explain.
 
Wierd how US intelligence was telling everyone about the invasion, yet they did nothing diplomatically.
Citation needed.

Russia being preoccupied with war is to the US advantage. Comment has nothing to do with Russia.
So the Russians did something that benefitted the US, and that is somehow the fault of the US???
 
I wish you would do your own fact checking:

It's not a pentagon fact checker.
Here are just the top ten institutions that use it as a fact checker:

What is Media Bias/Fact check?

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News) is an independent online media outlet. MBFC is dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices. We also provide original articles on media bias, journalism and politics. On our social media pages we provide current news and events from low biased sources as well as all content posted on our website.

Who owns and runs Media Bias/Fact Check?

Media Bias Fact Check, LLC is a Limited Liability Company owned solely by Dave Van Zandt. He also makes all final editing and publishing decisions.

Media Bias Fact Check is frequently used as a resource for Educational Institutions and Libraries. Below is a shortlist of the top 10 institutions that use MBFC as an educational resource.



This page breaks down how Media Bias Fact Check LLC is funded. MBFC is a sole proprietor limited liability company (LLC) held by Dave Van Zandt in North Carolina.

Advertising (55%) – Media Bias Fact Check relies on two third-party advertising companies, Google Adsense and Newor Media. We use third-party advertising because it allows us to be free from influence. The above providers generate ads through cookies, your search history, and the content of the page you are viewing. MBFC in no way has control over the ads you see displayed. Hence, we are not motivated by payment from a single corporation, person, or political party. To successfully earn money from advertising, we need consistent page views; therefore, our sole mission is to provide quality content to bring people back to our website.



The quarterly is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, whose members are the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States.
The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department's legal adviser. The president's national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate.

This is not a retinue of people who "look like America," as the president once put it, but they very definitely look like the people who, for more than half a century, have managed our international affairs and our military-industrial complex. John W. Davis, a Wall Street lawyer, was chosen as the council's first president in 1921 and three years later was the Democratic candidate for president against Calvin Coolidge. His successors at the council were from the same mold -- financiers, corporate lawyers and industrialists. John J. McCloy, described by Richard Rovere years ago as the patriarch of the American establishment, served as council chairman from 1953 until 1970. Allen Dulles, first head of the CIA, was a council director for 42 years and was its president from 1946 until 1950. David Rockefeller succeeded McCloy, serving as chairman from 1970 until 1985. His successor is Peter Peterson.

this isn't very difficult...
 
The Constitution of the People's Republic of China (PRC) states that its form of government is "people's democratic dictatorship". The Constitution also holds that China is a one-party state that is governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

They used the word.
Now you need to explain.
Cool, do North Korea next.

You're a lunatic. :X3:
 
Your magic word was used.
Your one that makes actions moral.
So explain how the two democracies differ ?
North Korea also calls itself the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea"

Hint, simply labelling your own country ax a democracy doesn't mean you are one.
 
North Korea also calls itself the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea"

Hint, simply labelling your own country ax a democracy doesn't mean you are one.
So now you gotta show the difference.
They both have the magic moral word.
Prove one is better than the other.
Or more moral.
 
I wish you would do your own fact checking:

It's not a pentagon fact checker.
Here are just the top ten institutions that use it as a fact checker:

What is Media Bias/Fact check?

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News) is an independent online media outlet. MBFC is dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices. We also provide original articles on media bias, journalism and politics. On our social media pages we provide current news and events from low biased sources as well as all content posted on our website.

Who owns and runs Media Bias/Fact Check?

Media Bias Fact Check, LLC is a Limited Liability Company owned solely by Dave Van Zandt. He also makes all final editing and publishing decisions.

Media Bias Fact Check is frequently used as a resource for Educational Institutions and Libraries. Below is a shortlist of the top 10 institutions that use MBFC as an educational resource.

Knowing your position on global warming, your darling fact checker completely disagrees with you. They call it a blatant lie. Guess fact check is only as good as it supports your own views right?

Claim by CBN News: Carbon dioxide is not a climate heat driver; we had an ice age when the Earth had extraordinarily larger amounts of carbon dioxide; in the 1970s scientists thought we were going to have a new ice age.


Climate Feedback rating: Incorrect (As a greenhouse gas, additional carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, driven by human emissions, exerts a warming effect on the planet and has been demonstrated to be the dominant driver of modern global warming and climate change.)
 
I wish you would do your own fact checking:

It's not a pentagon fact checker.
Here are just the top ten institutions that use it as a fact checker:

What is Media Bias/Fact check?

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News) is an independent online media outlet. MBFC is dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices. We also provide original articles on media bias, journalism and politics. On our social media pages we provide current news and events from low biased sources as well as all content posted on our website.

Who owns and runs Media Bias/Fact Check?

Media Bias Fact Check, LLC is a Limited Liability Company owned solely by Dave Van Zandt. He also makes all final editing and publishing decisions.

Media Bias Fact Check is frequently used as a resource for Educational Institutions and Libraries. Below is a shortlist of the top 10 institutions that use MBFC as an educational resource.


Lmao!
 
China is a dictatorship
Taiwan is a democracy
If you can't discern the moral difference between the two, then am not sure there is anything I can say to convince you.
Just to throw a spanner in the works.
You can't technically say democracy is morally superior. It's just the system we are used to.
For those that did not take a course or two in political science at varsity this is a short article, but not very in-depth, that may be interesting. ( I could find better sources, but this isn't the place for an in-depth discussing so it should be sufficient to make the point)


Democracy itself has a few variation as well as certain problems. But basically it's a "the best we have at the moment" kinda thing. Much like how capitalism has for decades been considered as such, yet these days some people prefer social democracy (not to be confused with socialism). Who knows what will be considered the "morally superior" version in the next century
 
Cannot link to a non event.
So you assume that because you personally don't know of any diplomatic efforts that means there weren't any? Am curious, what is your diplomatic status such that you feel qualified to make these kind of pronouncements?

The US did something that benefited them and invasion is the end result.
What did they do specifically? How did they force the Russians to invade?
 
Just to throw a spanner in the works.
You can't technically say democracy is morally superior. It's just the system we are used to.
For those that did not take a course or two in political science at varsity this is a short article, but not very in-depth, that may be interesting. ( I could find better sources, but this isn't the place for an in-depth discussing so it should be sufficient to make the point)


Democracy itself has a few variation as well as certain problems. But basically it's a "the best we have at the moment" kinda thing. Much like how capitalism has for decades been considered as such, yet these days some people prefer social democracy (not to be confused with socialism). Who knows what will be considered the "morally superior" version in the next century
Fair enough...

democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others that have been tried.
Now tell me why you think that the Chinese system is better?
 
Fair enough...


Now tell me why you think that the Chinese system is better?
I don't live there so I can't comment. Closest was in Taiwan, but besides some cultural differences one 1st world city is pretty much like the next..

We've been expecting them to break their shackles and rise up for decades. We debated at university that as their standard of living increases they will be less willing to work for, what we consider to be, slave wages which would essentially cripple their competitiveness with the rest of the world resulting in forced changes in their government. This hasn't happened. Sure there are some detractors and people that flee their country, but how significant is this to their overall population?

As to whether the system is better I suppose you could look at the influence exerted on the globe. Theirs have been rising consistently over the years, while western nations have started to wane. As westerners we view this as problematic, but for the average Chinese?
 
So you assume that because you personally don't know of any diplomatic efforts that means there weren't any? Am curious, what is your diplomatic status such that you feel qualified to make these kind of pronouncements?
As said before, there have been agreemtns in place (Minsk 1,Minsk 2) that were never followed through.
What did they do specifically? How did they force the Russians to invade?
Back to NATO expansion..
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X