Cricket: International Discussion Thread

Surely you can change the structure to accommodate more than 10 teams? Look how FIFA does it.
A typical professional soccer match will consist of two periods each 45 minutes long with a half-time of 15 minutes

A One Day International (ODI) is a form of limited overs cricket, played between two teams with international status, in which each team faces a fixed number of overs, currently 50, with the game lasting up to 9 hours.
 
A typical professional soccer match will consist of two periods each 45 minutes long with a half-time of 15 minutes

A One Day International (ODI) is a form of limited overs cricket, played between two teams with international status, in which each team faces a fixed number of overs, currently 50, with the game lasting up to 9 hours.
A world cup, with 10 countries.
 
A world cup, with 10 countries.
Do you even cricket?

Its not nearly as main stream as soccer. And that means you don't have the same amount of top tier teams competing.

To say you want more teams in the world cup is roughly the same as saying you demand 20 teams in f1 or bafana banana playing in the fifa world cup
 
The world cup has too few teams :/ .
Cricket doesn't care about growing the game.
This format insures India will play atleast 9 games.
That is all the ICC and the TV companies want.
They changed the format after 2007 cause India and Pakistan went home early.

Cricket is one of the few sports who prefers to decrease the teams playing at the WC.
 
Do you even cricket?

Its not nearly as main stream as soccer. And that means you don't have the same amount of top tier teams competing.

To say you want more teams in the world cup is roughly the same as saying you demand 20 teams in f1 or bafana banana playing in the fifa world cup
There weren't that many top teams in football when the world cups started. Teams aren't going to improve by sitting at home.

Atleast Bafana has a fair chance to qualify.
 
Cricket doesn't care about growing the game.
This format insures India will play atleast 9 games.
That is all the ICC and the TV companies want.
They changed the format after 2007 cause India and Pakistan went home early.

Cricket is one of the few sports who prefers to decrease the teams playing at the WC.

I dont see why they cant have the qualifiers as part of the World Cup as a precursor to the big teams coming in.
 
Do you even cricket?

Its not nearly as main stream as soccer. And that means you don't have the same amount of top tier teams competing.

To say you want more teams in the world cup is roughly the same as saying you demand 20 teams in f1 or bafana banana playing in the fifa world cup
Scotland/holland + WI may not make it and they've beaten some of the original 8 qualified teams plenty of times.

Do you not want to grow the game? No one said it's as popular as soccer but now that you mention it, surely it's more popular than rugby and thus can adopt the 4x4 pool stage groups?

I want the game to grow, simple.
 
Scotland/holland + WI may not make it and they've beaten some of the original 8 qualified teams plenty of times.

Do you not want to grow the game? No one said it's as popular as soccer but now that you mention it, surely it's more popular than rugby and thus can adopt the 4x4 pool stage groups?

I want the game to grow, simple.

Cricket is too steeped in TRADITION ... , so no.
 
Australia
David Warner, Usman Khawaja, Marnus Labuschagne, Steven Smith, Travis Head, Cameron Green, Alex Carey(w), Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins(c), Nathan Lyon, Josh Hazlewood

England
Zak Crawley, Ben Duckett, Ollie Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Ben Stokes(c), Jonny Bairstow(w), Stuart Broad, Ollie Robinson, Josh Tongue, James Anderson

England have won the toss and have opted to field
 
The world cup has too few teams :/ .
8 is enough.
It shouldn't drag on for 3 months.

There is a series of qualifiers before the WC where the other teams can play.

I think the 2007 World cup with 16 teams is still being played, should end any day now.
 
Australia
David Warner, Usman Khawaja, Marnus Labuschagne, Steven Smith, Travis Head, Cameron Green, Alex Carey(w), Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins(c), Nathan Lyon, Josh Hazlewood

England
Zak Crawley, Ben Duckett, Ollie Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Ben Stokes(c), Jonny Bairstow(w), Stuart Broad, Ollie Robinson, Josh Tongue, James Anderson

England have won the toss and have opted to field

I know he was sent around the park in the first test, but a brave call to leave Scott Boland out. Think he would have been good at Lords. Lots of grass on the pitch apparently. Still, Starc is a more than able replacement. Guile for raw pace. And able to hold a bat.
 
I know he was sent around the park in the first test, but a brave call to leave Scott Boland out. Think he would have been good at Lords. Lots of grass on the pitch apparently. Still, Starc is a more than able replacement. Guile for raw pace. And able to hold a bat.
Ponting said the same thing, similar issue with england picking tongue instead of woake(who has good stats @ lords).
 
I know he was sent around the park in the first test, but a brave call to leave Scott Boland out. Think he would have been good at Lords. Lots of grass on the pitch apparently. Still, Starc is a more than able replacement. Guile for raw pace. And able to hold a bat.
Would've dropped Bairstow for Foakes. Not having their specialist WK bit them in the arse previous match. They still have 6 top order batsmen left to play Baz-ball . Obviously, at the end of this match JB will have taken 10 catches, dropped none, 3 awesome legside stumpings and scored 180 in total at a run a ball ..... :D
 
Last edited:
****ing Protesters..

Good on Bairstow carrying one off and dumping it over the boundary rope

Fzs7hjFWAAA4VNj
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X