@Beyond.Celsus
Good post. Thanks for sharing. Your POV makes sense.
Good post. Thanks for sharing. Your POV makes sense.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I haven't been following that story but makes a good pass for same old corporate bs.Give or take 4-5 months and the game is going to be less 50%.
BTW, The Witcher 3 is currently on an 82% at GOG, don't know about Steam as I haven't logged in.
Now that the source code is in the wild, I think that CDPR is going to leverage that as an excuse to cancel some game components like multiplayer saying that it is vulnerable or something.
I haven't been following that story but makes a good pass for same old corporate bs.
The correct path from here would be to fix the fundamental broken things first if they can, then worry about extra features and content. Otherwise you will always suffer the phantoms within.Personally I wouldn't mind them ditching multiplayer if they redirect those resources into desired DLC. It is not long any more until they announce their next AAA for development.
The correct path from here would be to fix the fundamental broken things first if they can, then worry about extra features and content. Otherwise you will always suffer the phantoms within.
Yep. See what CDPR cooks up with CP2077 and whatever comes next...The multiplayer component was planned for 2022. If they are going to fix the game until then it should be rated no more than 4/10.
After Cyberpunk 2077, it's harder than ever to guess which of these big games will meet expectations
The sci-fi RPG is alright, but no Witcher 3. So what will the next truly essential singleplayer blockbuster be?
In a year or so, I'm sure some critics will reappraise Cyberpunk 2077, highlighting its strengths without years of pent-up hype coloring their perspective—it'll get the Mass Effect Andromeda treatment, in other words. But I doubt that Cyberpunk 2077 will ever be looked at as a landmark open world RPG in the way The Witcher 3 is. It's just a decent sci-fi RPG that had a buggy launch.
PC Gamer was one of three gaming media groups which was lynched on social media for their appropriate review of Cyberpunk 2077 which gives them the credence for posting articles like these,
![]()
After Cyberpunk 2077, it's harder than ever to guess which of these big games will meet expectations
The sci-fi RPG is alright, but no Witcher 3. So what will the next truly essential singleplayer blockbuster be?www.pcgamer.com
There are upcoming games like Diablo 4, TES 6, Starfield, all of which will be driven up by hype where some will fail to deliver as promised with high review scores, and around we all will go again.
I am a bit worried for Diablo 4... I just think it will not be as good as Diablo 3, and ARPG competition is tough now.
Diablo 3...Which game would you classify as competition for Diablo IV right now? (not PoE)

Diablo 3...![]()
If you say so...Also the only one I can think of that’s of that level. I’ve played quite a few and many just don’t live up to Diablo 3, the game’s a masterpiece.
If you say so...
If you say so...
While I do appreciate you enthusiasm there is probably bad news: you've already played them. However we can start a list your ARPG thread and then we could see other options?That’s just my experience but I’m open to suggestions if you have other good options.
Which games did you enjoy as much?
I may have, maybe not. I'm just asking your siggestions as there are a ton of games and it's highly likely I missed one.While I do appreciate you enthusiasm there is probably bad news: you've already played them. However we can start a list your ARPG thread and then we could see other options?
I just got a Cyberpunk 2077 refund after 55 hours of play on PS5 — here’s why
It took several dozen hours, but I’ve finally lost patience with Cyberpunk 2077, even on the PS5
After 55 hours with Cyberpunk 2077, playing through a huge chunk of what the game has to offer in that time, last week I put in a refund request and it was duly granted a few days later.
So, Cyberpunk 2077 hasn’t stolen any of my hard-earned money. But it did ultimately waste something more valuable: my time.
...
Of course, the obvious question is if the game was so buggy why did it take me 55 hours to reach my breaking point and put in a refund application?
After all, it’s not like Cyberpunk 2077 is the first overhyped game I’ve wasted my time and money on; I have the digital deluxe edition of Marvel’s Avengers to prove it. Why has this specific release got me standing on my soapbox?
I could claim that I was soldiering on through sheer determination. But in truth, I was still playing because underneath all the issues there’s a genuinely great game and I wanted to see my V’s adventure through to the end.