Geez, did you guys all get out the wrong side this morning? Or has it become such a habit to attack anything posted by myBB or quoted by the networks that you don't bother to read the articles properly?
The article clearly states different numbers; the devices, the data per device and the total data per device type. And all the numbers quoted are in line.
@LeonP: You're right, the ratio is actually
64.8446:35.1554 and not the wildly inaccurate 60:40 Pieter used while chatting informally over a few drinks with a couple of people.
I understand you talk like that, but most sane people would round to a logical number for the sake of simplicity.
Pieter was also wrong on the 80:20 starment, BTW. It was, in fact, 80.1282:19.8718.
I'll sort him out and explain myBB members always quote factual numbers (and only factual numbers, they never speculate or make assumptions) down to the 5th decimal and would never make statements not supported by fully audited numbers.