Do you believe aliens exist?

Do you believe aliens exist?

  • Yes

    Votes: 351 69.1%

  • No

    Votes: 105 20.7%

  • Other

    Votes: 52 10.2%
  • Total voters
    508
Lupus said:
but the older I get, the more I think the governments worldwide are probably the thickest people I've seen and cannot see them hiding anything. Maybe some military brass with brains is keeping even the governments in the dark who knows.
Click to expand...
I agree fully with that statement.
I see stupidity everywhere. Even in America. And they can’t keep secrets forever.
If there was any doubt… Snowden would have produced some kind of evidence of cover up.
Instead we got what we knew all along - big brother is watching you .

As I said… they ain’t got no time for little green men or spaceships. Nope! They wanna know what we’re doing online and track us everywhere
 
EmmanuelGoldstein said:
I agree fully with that statement.
I see stupidity everywhere. Even in America. And they can’t keep secrets forever.
If there was any doubt… Snowden would have produced some kind of evidence of cover up.
Instead we got what we knew all along - big brother is watching you .

As I said… they ain’t got no time for little green men or spaceships. Nope! They wanna know what we’re doing online and track us everywhere
Click to expand...
You almost didn't get one, almost :-)
1762172935697.png
But you maybe closer to the truth.
 
wingnut771 said:
What about that dome of the rock ufo that was filmed from many different angles?
Click to expand...
Yeah, that “Rock Dome” sighting everyone keeps bringing up is actually the Dome of the Rock UFO clip from back in 2011. You know, the one where a glowing light drops down over Jerusalem like it’s about to beam up the Ark of the Covenant — then zips off like it forgot to pay parking.


At first glance it looks wild, I’ll give it that. But once people started poking at it, the whole thing fell apart faster than a flat-earth debate. The “different angles” were supposedly from random witnesses, except most of them came from accounts made the same week, and a few used the same visual effects. Kinda suspicious, right?


Also, if a literal UFO hovered over one of the most photographed religious sites on Earth, you’d expect, I don’t know, more than three grainy YouTube clips and zero tourists freaking out in the background. No news crews, no military reports — just pixel soup and dramatic music.


Most likely it was a hoax or someone playing with VFX. Maybe a drone, maybe a reflection, maybe someone’s bored film project. Either way, cool story, but not exactly “first contact.”
 
wizardofid said:
Yeah, that “Rock Dome” sighting everyone keeps bringing up is actually the Dome of the Rock UFO clip from back in 2011. You know, the one where a glowing light drops down over Jerusalem like it’s about to beam up the Ark of the Covenant — then zips off like it forgot to pay parking.


At first glance it looks wild, I’ll give it that. But once people started poking at it, the whole thing fell apart faster than a flat-earth debate. The “different angles” were supposedly from random witnesses, except most of them came from accounts made the same week, and a few used the same visual effects. Kinda suspicious, right?


Also, if a literal UFO hovered over one of the most photographed religious sites on Earth, you’d expect, I don’t know, more than three grainy YouTube clips and zero tourists freaking out in the background. No news crews, no military reports — just pixel soup and dramatic music.


Most likely it was a hoax or someone playing with VFX. Maybe a drone, maybe a reflection, maybe someone’s bored film project. Either way, cool story, but not exactly “first contact.”
Click to expand...
I want this first contact
1762173196135.png
 
wizardofid said:
I prefer the alternate version, the dark history version episode, where we blown up everything and enslave everyone
Click to expand...
I knew that goatee wasn't just for fashion... You mirror-verse you.
 
wizardofid said:
Yeah, that “Rock Dome” sighting everyone keeps bringing up is actually the Dome of the Rock UFO clip from back in 2011. You know, the one where a glowing light drops down over Jerusalem like it’s about to beam up the Ark of the Covenant — then zips off like it forgot to pay parking.


At first glance it looks wild, I’ll give it that. But once people started poking at it, the whole thing fell apart faster than a flat-earth debate. The “different angles” were supposedly from random witnesses, except most of them came from accounts made the same week, and a few used the same visual effects. Kinda suspicious, right?


Also, if a literal UFO hovered over one of the most photographed religious sites on Earth, you’d expect, I don’t know, more than three grainy YouTube clips and zero tourists freaking out in the background. No news crews, no military reports — just pixel soup and dramatic music.


Most likely it was a hoax or someone playing with VFX. Maybe a drone, maybe a reflection, maybe someone’s bored film project. Either way, cool story, but not exactly “first contact.”
Click to expand...
What about crop circles where the nodes of the plants are burnt from the inside then bent over?
1762173515121.png
 
wingnut771 said:
What about crop circles where the nodes of the plants are burnt from the inside then bent over?
View attachment 1860541
Click to expand...
Honestly, crop circles are one of those “cool to look at, not so mysterious once you dig in” kind of things. Most of them are man-made — people with planks, ropes, and a free night out in the fields. There are even groups like the Circlemakers who literally go around making these things as art. Once you see them do it, the whole “aliens sent us a message in wheat” vibe fades fast.


Now, about the “burned from the inside out” claim — that one’s been floating around for years. When researchers actually looked closer, what people thought was “burning” was more like cell rupture from pressure and heat, often caused by the stalks being bent while still green or slightly damp. No actual scorching, no radiation, just physics and plant biology doing their thing. The idea that they were “microwaved” from within sounds cool, but the evidence doesn’t hold up under a microscope — literally.

The thing is, even with advance technology you would finding trace amount of radiation or exotic particles have a half-life, extremely short. But still.


BTW made you a song just for you

 
wizardofid said:
Honestly, crop circles are one of those “cool to look at, not so mysterious once you dig in” kind of things. Most of them are man-made — people with planks, ropes, and a free night out in the fields. There are even groups like the Circlemakers who literally go around making these things as art. Once you see them do it, the whole “aliens sent us a message in wheat” vibe fades fast.


Now, about the “burned from the inside out” claim — that one’s been floating around for years. When researchers actually looked closer, what people thought was “burning” was more like cell rupture from pressure and heat, often caused by the stalks being bent while still green or slightly damp. No actual scorching, no radiation, just physics and plant biology doing their thing. The idea that they were “microwaved” from within sounds cool, but the evidence doesn’t hold up under a microscope — literally.

The thing is, even with advance technology you would finding trace amount of radiation or exotic particles have a half-life


BTW made you a song just for you

Click to expand...
Yes, ignore the fake ones, I'm referring to the ones where the nodes steamed themselves like a microwave.
 
wingnut771 said:
Who and how was this built:
View attachment 1860550
View attachment 1860551View attachment 1860552View attachment 1860553
Click to expand...
Humans have always been smart, we tend to think of ancient people being dumb, but they were just as smart as us. Oddly enough the Romans were one of the reasons for stagnation, not the "dark" ages as people think.
Romans tended to wanted things done a particular way and that is the way it remained for centuries, they also had slave labour for things that could've been made into machines like we do today.
 
wingnut771 said:
Yes, ignore the fake ones, I'm referring to the ones where the nodes steamed themselves like a microwave.
Click to expand...
Listen to what you are asking, dismissing results, that is dismissing and cherry picking is it not. That is like saying I am going to have sex with 50 women and only use the results where they didn't ask if it is in..........
 
wizardofid said:
Listen to what you are asking, dismissing results, that is dismissing and cherry picking is it not. That is like saying I am going to have sex with 50 women and only use the results where they didn't ask if it is in..........
Click to expand...
Well removing the anomalies of those that just down right say no. But still claiming you had sex with 50 women when it was maybe 5.
 
Lupus said:
Well removing the anomalies of those that just down right say no. But still claiming you had sex with 50 women when it was maybe 5.
Click to expand...
How often to do fat chicks say no to some strange.....Paying them isn't out of the question either, being a serial killer is another option as well....I normally sit on hand first.

But yeah excluding valid results is pushing the narrative, where you would like it to go, not where it is pointing to....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X