Do you believe aliens exist?

Do you believe aliens exist?

  • Yes

    Votes: 351 69.1%

  • No

    Votes: 105 20.7%

  • Other

    Votes: 52 10.2%
  • Total voters
    508
Lupus said:
Well that is wrong considering we didn't evolve from Neanderthals, they were an offshoot and we interbred
Click to expand...
Actually quite accurate on the inbred part, it is estimated some 70k years ago, there were only between 1000 - 10000 pairs of breeding humans around. It is widely agreed we suffered a major genetic bottleneck at some point in the past.
 
wizardofid said:
Actually quite accurate on the inbred part, it is estimated some 70k years ago, there were only between 1000 - 10000 pairs of breeding humans around. It is widely agreed we suffered a major genetic bottleneck at some point in the past.
Click to expand...

Thats a lot of sex to get us to where we are

Adam and eve have left the chat
 
wingnut771 said:
I'm saying homosapien with our big brains just appeared one day in an evolution point of view.
View attachment 1861134
Click to expand...
You're showing a bunch of developmental forms building on each other demonstrating evolution over time and going "bruh we just sort of SHOWED UP OUT OF NOWHERE"

We didn't. As I said I don't know what to do with this term "missing link". There are plenty of examples of transitional forms between humans and our monkey ancestors.

I give you another example of the history of human evolution and you'll point to either side of it and go "look there! Now there's 2 missing links!". It's idiotic. We have more than enough evidence, not just fossil, but also genetic demonstrating that humans evolved. You'd need something equally incredible evidence-wise to refute this.

I know you want to think aliens planted us here or something equally silly, but it's just not supported by the evidence we have at hand. I'm sorry mate.
 
wizardofid said:
How do I say it without sounding like a speciesist. Some have a little more neanderthal genes that most.....A few of us didn’t get the memo on evolving past clubbing things with sticks
Click to expand...
Not really an insult as it would've been in the past :). Neanderthals have since shown they were on par with sapiens sapiens
 
wingnut771 said:
So we are not test tube babies engineered to be slaves to mine gold for the Anunnaki?
View attachment 1861141

Who are the Anunnaki?
Click to expand...
You demonstrate an example of the gradual morphological change over time with that sloped forehead gradually moving closer to the modern human forehead we know today and you're STILL saying we came out of nowhere.

What on Earth man.
 
wizardofid said:
Yeah, see, that’s the funny part people always skip over — everyone points at that little “breathing” motion like it’s some smoking gun, but no one stops to ask why an alien would even be breathing like a human in the first place.

If this thing supposedly came from another planet, or another dimension, what are the odds it evolved lungs, a diaphragm, and a nervous system that twitches the same way ours does when we die? That’s some real cosmic coincidence right there. Whole different gravity, atmosphere, biology — yet somehow it still gasps for air like a dude passed out at the gym. Makes zero sense.

Even if you did see a twitch, that doesn’t mean “alive.” Dead tissue or flexible rubber under freezing conditions can shift a little when light or temperature changes — especially under a flickering bulb and grainy VHS compression. That tiny flicker people swear is “breathing” could just be lighting distortion or the guy bumping the camera. Anyone who’s messed with old tapes knows how much fake “motion” you can get from static and compression noise alone.

And let’s be real — Reed’s “alien” looks like something out of a late-’90s effects workshop. No pores, no muscle tone, stiff joints. Every supposed “original” video online is the same copy-of-a-copy version, conveniently missing clear close-ups or continuous uncut shots. You’d think if someone had an alien corpse, they’d at least film the whole thing in one take before shoving it in a freezer next to the frozen peas.

So yeah, even ignoring the sketchy backstory and missing evidence, the whole “look, it twitched!” claim just doesn’t hold water. We’re not talking about a real biological specimen here — we’re talking about bad lighting, tape noise, and people seeing what they want to see.
Click to expand...

The gasps for air and wretching was not the alien, but Dr Jonathan Reed, like a guy passed out at a gym.

Why wouldn't a carbon based lifeform evolve lungs? Many claims have been made that ancients (prior civilization) live underground and in the ocean. US government coined the term "non human". Anomalous crafts and beings aren't necessarily out of this world.

While filming the his investigation of the being, there were a number of close ups. Just like in the 1996 Varginha case, the film is blurry.




Mariner said:
George Adamski faked hovering craft in the 1940s and 50s.



Its way below the quaility of the 80s as shown by @wizardofid in post #629:
Click to expand...

The fake hovering craft by George Adamski was obvious. The landing struts were lightbulbs with the GE logo written on them.

But not everything is an obvious debunk. Take for example Bob Lazar with the disinformation campaign against him, and the evidence that surfaced decades later that has vindicated him.
 
Those more interested in working out what's actually going on with the masses of strange events, than doing the fire dance around the science flames of uncertainty and presumption counter-logic, suggest you watch a good handful of episodes of Ancient Aliens.

Yes, it's got a bad name, and for sure there was a fair degree of exaggeration and jumping to conclusions, plus too much padding sometimes. But also some AMAZING facts, you'll find too many hard to deny or look past.

Problem is there's tons of episodes. But if you're willing to try seriously, doubt you'll be disappointed. I would say it cemented years of casual inquiry for me.


(Not back here to debate, but do your thing)
 
wizardofid said:
Basically just go and sit right at the edge of a black hole event horizon
Click to expand...
Is it still okay to say that?

I was doing something for an article on Friday, wrote "black hole", and suddenly remembered the recent renaming of stuff.

Decided bugger that, if that is what somebody is going to critique on, they're probably not really interested in the subject matter. :ROFL:
 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ said:
Is it still okay to say that?

I was doing something for an article on Friday, wrote "black hole", and suddenly remembered the recent renaming of stuff.

Decided bugger that, if that is what somebody is going to critique on, they're probably not really interested in the subject matter. :ROFL:
Click to expand...

As far I am aware it is black hole, two words as it was first coined. If it changed it does really matter, it still sucks, whether you write it as two words or compound it.

Speaking of which there is a few people I would like to send to the center of our galaxy, with any luck, they will likely miss the singularity and pop into a new universe, at least they can go annoy and fck up someone else's universe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X