I was coming back from the catholic church and was feeling emo/sad, it.
They were trying to cheer you up :erm:
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I was coming back from the catholic church and was feeling emo/sad, it.
no problem - I will gladly take you up on this - I will dress up as an arab and go to Rabin square in Israel holding up signs saying free palestine and what not and at the same time you dress up as a jew and do the same in ramallah in the West bank saying down with suicide bombings and arab terror - now lets take bets on which one of us gets out alive and which one not.![]()
:erm: no... I'm not claiming that the West Bank is a democracy that supports freedom of speech so I've no need to prove anything.
You (or Marine1, at any rate) are claiming that Israel has freedom, freedom of speech etc, Marine1 says that he never felt more safe. So I challenged him, if you want to take it up go ahead and get someone to film it please. I'm not going to do the same in Ramallah because I've made no claims regarding freedom there and have no need to.
You guys do this all the time, you think that by pointing out that Ramallah isn't free somehow disproves my argument that Israel isn't free, but actually it's not relevant.![]()
There is no need to test Israel as an establishment because there is more than enough evidence of pro palestine demonstrations that have been held inside Israel, so we can already determine that there is freedom of speech inside Israel, unlike as you have said, in the Palestinian areas.
I can supply links, but you can google and see for yourself.
Now what would happen if you dressed up as an Arab and started demonstrating in Tel-Aviv - I'm sure you would get support and also people that would object - that is what tends to happen in a democracy - but at least you would be allowed to voice an opinion.
:erm: no... I'm not claiming that the West Bank is a democracy that supports freedom of speech so I've no need to prove anything.
You (or Marine1, at any rate) are claiming that Israel has freedom, freedom of speech etc, Marine1 says that he never felt more safe. So I challenged him, if you want to take it up go ahead and get someone to film it please. I'm not going to do the same in Ramallah because I've made no claims regarding freedom there and have no need to.
You guys do this all the time, you think that by pointing out that Ramallah isn't free somehow disproves my argument that Israel isn't free, but actually it's not relevant.![]()
ExactlyPolice stop a suspicious looking guy walking down the street covering his face with a tshirt, he gets released after a short investigation, wheres the problem? They just doing their job
If only our police were so proactive, here you can walk down the street wearing a balaclava and they wont stop eating lunch to ask whats the story
And neither is North Korea. They withdrew from it in 2003. So why is the west still going for North Korea, but not Israel? Double standards. They are hypocrites.
In any case, nuclear weapons are nuclear weapons? Whether a country's president has signed a document or not, it doesn't change anything.
The west obviously have other agendas in the Middle East.
They've already caused havoc in almost every part of the Middle East. Except for Iran. They're afraid. What cowards.
BS, Iran never threatened anyone. They havent killed inoccent people and almost destroyed Palestine. Israel should not be trusted with Nuclear weapons!!!
Why not?
If Israel has nukes, then they've had them for at least 45 years.
They more likely to use them than Iran.
Besides, they havent declared how many they have.
They more likely to use them than Iran.
Besides, they havent declared how many they have.
To all the pro zionist fanboys stop reading and spreading disinformationNorth Korea violated the treaty and then withdrew from it.
Israel, India and Pakistan have not violated the treaty
and conventional weapons are conventional weapons, other than stating the obvious do you have a point?
Irrelevant to Israel's nuclear status.
Iran is in compliance of NPT by having all facilities disclosed and open for IAEA monitoring. On Monday September 21, 2009 Iran disclosed to IAEA per NPT terms of 180 day notification of a new nuclear energy facility that is about 18 months away from operation link
They haven't used them in 45 years despite provacation and opportunity, and this naturally makes them more likely to used them?
Peaceful Iran is racing gleefully to acquire the capacity, that they're unlikely to use?
Logic fail I think.
More likely than Iran? Wow, your translation changes more often than nathi mthethwa changes 5 star hotel rooms
You dont even know what to believe
spreading disinformation
To all the pro zionist fanboys stop reading and spreading disinformation
Iran is in compliance of NPT by having all facilities disclosed and open for IAEA monitoring. On Monday September 21, 2009 Iran disclosed to IAEA per NPT terms of 180 day notification of a new nuclear energy facility that is about 18 months away from operation link
Ofcourse!!! Nobody trusts Israel!! They think they can bully everyone...
They cant drop a nuclear weapon in Palestine now can they.
Iran wont use it on Israel.
They could, it would be very stupid, and atypical of them, but they could.