Well, the SD PVR was still R1999 at the time...
I THINK that's what the guy means... it wasn't over R4000 or something ridiculous like that... It was competitive with respect to their other satellite products.
Importing a SD PVR that is similar to the features to the HD pvr in functionality (no 2nd tv etc) will cost you R7'000 to import. HD equipment will be slightly more. Then none of the EPG stuff or multichoice applications will work either, because of Multichoice's propriety software.
Once you watch the sport on HD it makes it worth it! Knowing that there'll be more and more content available in the future is a bonus, but watching real-time sport on HD is what makes these bugs just mild irritations as opposed to stomach ulcers.
It is worth it... as long as your TV is already FULL HD ready and is a decent size and quality. Some of the "not so good" TV's have a really pastel kind of feel to them with HD content... like the colours have been tampered with almost... I don't want to brand-bash here, but look carefully before saving R1000 on a LCD TV with a really inferior Picture Quality, even if it is one of the "big and trusted brands"
One example is the Samsung 40" Full HD TV... The picture is "funny"! It looks like the picture was enhanced using "MS Paint". The picture has a pastel kind of feel and motion looks and feels wrong too. My sister bought one recently and I didn't have the heart to tell her that I find the picture to be far inferior to other LCD's I've seen around. (It was on a mega-special tho)
That is not entirely true, LCD might appear more elegant to the eye because it fools you, displaying colours that is actually not close to what was originally recorded. This can cause a heated debate into what is better, some actually prefer the "morphed" look. You will find that the more expensive equipment most of the time deliver as close as possible to the original recording, and might disappoint those that are used to looking at modified output.

You will especially find this with audio equipment, the more you pay the more crappier it sounds to guy that bought a less expensive equipment. Some audiophiles might agree with me here. I prefer the close to original sound/video, and might not appeal to those that prefer the lesser.

Don't forget the built-in hardware deinterlacer, hardware scaler, all depends on which methods they follow and of course what what your output device is doing to the signal. I prefer plasma, because black is truly black unlike on LCD. Until they start using LED to replace the backlit. LCD will always be bad to those that can pick up the difference.
Its not just samsung... A friend of mine has the B&0 65" plasma (about R150 000 worth of TV) and you had that same kind of sensation with motion as you did with those first LCD monitors with a 24ms response time... that ghosting effect when you played fast paced FPS games, well this Plasma had that kind of feel to normal television and DVD's. He's sitting next to me going "WOW! check the picture! Its like watching REAL LIFE"... I was like "Yeah... amazing!"
Yes that was one of the main hurdles for LCD panels to go bigger, was the response. They claim that they did over come this problem, but we will still have to wait for equipment that was adapted to the new method of delivery.
HD still has a long way to go.
