Fair usage policies - Hosting Unlimited explains

FUPs on unlimited/uncapped products?

  • Acceptable. They are necessary to maintain service levels

    Votes: 23 21.1%
  • Acceptable for different reasons (comment in forum)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Depends (leave an explanation)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Unacceptable. They shouldn't be advertised as such then

    Votes: 85 78.0%
  • Unacceptable for different reasons (comment in forum)

    Votes: 1 0.9%

  • Total voters
    109
Anything. There are a billion snazzy names out there. How about "The Dang Awesome Huge Hosting Package"?

The term everyone on this forum is looking for, is "unmetered". That means 24/7/365 max-out bandwidth, not restrained by an FUP. Most large ISPs sell it as a more expensive option than unlimited packages. It's not the hoster's fault their users don't understand the definition of "unlimited" even though they put together these long FUPs which describe exactly what "unlimited bandwidth" is.
 
It floors me that... after being ripped off for so many years in SA... some consumers are quite content to now be ripped off in another manner.

What ever happened to "Truth in Advertising"? What ever happened to ethics and honesty?

Just label the damn product accurately. If you do not intend on providing a completely unfettered unlimited service then don't use that name.

Leave it for those who intend to provide the service honestly.
 
It floors me that... after being ripped off for so many years in SA... some consumers are quite content to now be ripped off in another manner.
What ever happened to "Truth in Advertising"? What ever happened to ethics and honesty?
Just label the damn product accurately. If you do not intend on providing a completely unfettered unlimited service then don't use that name.
Leave it for those who intend to provide the service honestly.

1. This is nothing to do with South Africa, and not unique to us. We didn't invent the FUP, we just copied the rest of the world.
2. Truth in advertising? I'd fancy my chances finding bigfoot.
3. See my unlimited/unmetered post above
4. That's what the FUP is. If they provide an FUP and then don't stick to it, it's only at that point you can call them out as liars.
 
I think FUP's are there as a safety net, Lets give this Unlimited thing a shot with these people, they are doing something different at a fraction of the cost and Elvis is right for the normal everyday user an R89 unlimited plan is going to be more than adequate. Its peace of mind for the average user. I kind of like the package names small , medium and super size.... Drive through hosting.... If anyone from Hosting Unlimited is listening... On an another note there is a kind of appeal to Unlimited Web hosting.
 
1. This is nothing to do with South Africa, and not unique to us. We didn't invent the FUP, we just copied the rest of the world.

Please show me one other country or link that shows an ISP outside of South Africa offering an unlimited/uncapped service where the FUP threatens to disconnect the user if he uses too much?
 
I think FUP's are there as a safety net, Lets give this Unlimited thing a shot with these people, they are doing something different at a fraction of the cost and Elvis is right for the normal everyday user an R89 unlimited plan is going to be more than adequate. Its peace of mind for the average user. I kind of like the package names small , medium and super size.... Drive through hosting.... If anyone from Hosting Unlimited is listening... On an another note there is a kind of appeal to Unlimited Web hosting.

I don't see anyone in here arguing about the pricing or saying that the deal is too expensive. It's not... it is great. All we are asking for is a more accurate description. Because we know that if we allows the providers to start twisting the truth in this regard, they will take the ball and run with it... and you will have all kinds of false advertising. It's hard enough as it is to take these guys to the ASA and get them to be honest. Let's not make it easier for them. Uncapped = Unlimited = Unrestricted.
 
Search the web, pretty much all Unlimited Plans in the states threaten to disconnect and worse they threaten to do so without warning! I speak from experience. I just read Hosting Unlimited's Unlimited Policy they don't threaten to cut you off they seem to want to make a plan for users who are heavy duty.
 
Search the web, pretty much all Unlimited Plans in the states threaten to disconnect and worse they threaten to do so without warning! I speak from experience. I just read Hosting Unlimited's Unlimited Policy they don't threaten to cut you off they seem to want to make a plan for users who are heavy duty.

So you won't have any problem providing me with a link then?
 
Employees of a certain unnamed company? :D

See now this amuses me, when this forum is positive it is automatically assumed one works for the company in question? , Is this forum not actually about FUP's - I work for a BANK how about you ELVIS?
 
See now this amuses me, when this forum is positive it is automatically assumed one works for the company in question? , Is this forum not actually about FUP's - I work for a BANK how about you ELVIS?

Oh yeah... you just happened to be browsing the site randomly... and decided to register and post in this thread because you felt so passionate about defending this company?
 
See now this amuses me, when this forum is positive it is automatically assumed one works for the company in question? , Is this forum not actually about FUP's - I work for a BANK how about you ELVIS?

No, when a said new forumite only joins to defend some new company then suspicion arises. Also when he/she defends a rather unpopular view then it draws the forumites intentions even further into question. We have had this very same argument MANY times before. Why didn't you see fit to join then and add your 2c's...? ;)
 
Please show me one other country or link that shows an ISP outside of South Africa offering an unlimited/uncapped service where the FUP threatens to disconnect the user if he uses too much?

Sure thing, random 1st one on google. http://www.ipage.com/legal/legal_aup.bml

See #4 - these guys happen to have a particulaly bad clause that gives them the right to cancel your account without proof or warning: "16.Utilize the Services in any other manner to interrupt or interfere with the Internet usage of other persons."

Second random search result from google - http://www.justhost.com/terms-and-conditions?hidenav
I believe this is relevant: " In all cases, the Services are intended for normal use only, and any activity that results in excessive usage that is inconsistent with normal usage patterns is strictly prohibited. JustHost reserves the right to suspend, discontinue or delete the accounts of Users whose use of disk space, bandwidth or other resources results in or presents the risk of degradation of service to other customers, regardless of the amount of disk space, bandwidth or other resources included in the User's plan."
 
See now this amuses me, when this forum is positive it is automatically assumed one works for the company in question? , Is this forum not actually about FUP's - I work for a BANK how about you ELVIS?

Currently i'm in mobile and Geospatial solutions, but I spent 10+ years in the ISP game when it was all beginning in za. Happy to be out of it. Mainly cos of the users. I think you can understand why :) "But I got an engaged tone when I dialled. What do you mean you have 20,000 subscribers but not 20,000 modems?!" ... this argument is the same crap, different subject matter.
 
Hmm, OK Yay... you win! :p

But I would love to know what they consider abuse... and what our South African ISPs consider abuse.

I would venture to guess the difference is on the order of terabytes of difference.

Anyway.... seems like the users here have spoken. Nearly 80% find the use of the term unacceptable.

I for one will not be making use of ANY service which is dishonest in it's advertising or product descriptions.

Only a fool would continue to force such a description on users in the face of such overwhelming dislike for the terminology.

Tell that to your boss :D
 
But I would love to know what they consider abuse... and what our South African ISPs consider abuse.

Not many ISPs anywhere in the world will say what the bandwidth abuse is, because it's such a fluid resource, with so many variables. These Hosting Unlimited guys do say exactly what their resource abuse policy is, though - it's on their side, hidden under "Resource Abuse Policy".

I would venture to guess the difference is on the order of terabytes of difference.

I wouldn't venture to guess anything. You know what they say - assumption is the mother of all f-ups.

Anyway.... seems like the users here have spoken. Nearly 80% find the use of the term unacceptable.

Utterly irrelevent when it's quite clear they don't understand the subject matter.

I for one will not be making use of ANY service which is dishonest in it's advertising or product descriptions.

Then take Openweb out your tagline - are they still selling the uncapped express+ 384's as uncapped express+ 512 accounts? They did it for years. Joke of a company, really.

Only a fool would continue to force such a description on users in the face of such overwhelming dislike for the terminology.

This isn't about that. It's about the ignorance of users. Same in pretty much every industry in the world. Most people don't understand the difference between warrantees/guarantees/motorplans on cars for example, and assume they're interchangeable. I don't feel it's the seller's obligation to clarify every single word they use. Ignorant buyers get shafted all the time, just remember: "if it seems to good to be true... it probably is" and you'll avoid a lot of disappointment in life.

Tell that to your boss :D

Consider it told. That'd be me.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X