FNB explains their website redesign

[MagicDude4Eva]

Some laughs to be had when inspecting the source:



Shouldn't build HTML?

I am just fascinated about the poor quality of the code and the complete lack of best practises (TBH as a developer I would not plaster my name all over JS code). CSS and JS are not minified, no use of CDN, several 404 resources, static content is not cacheable, images not optimized - just shows that no-one in their tech team has any clue about website optimization (makes one wonder how their backend Java was developed then).

 

[Room112]

Had a nightmare trying to add a Standard Bank Recipient, After 30 minutes of trying call centre operator advised me to make a once-off payment.

 

[Fuzzbox]

Please give us old WEBSITE back. PLEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASE.

 

[Ianf1]

Just tried on my S3 mini, what a pain to look at transactions on it it you really have to drill down. I prefer the PC for that, but it will be useful for adhoc payments.

 

[DrJohnZoidberg]

Just tried on my S3 mini, what a pain to look at transactions on it it you really have to drill down. I prefer the PC for that, but it will be useful for adhoc payments.

On the app?

 

[longboy]

The new site looks like it was designed by a schoolgoing kid... so square-ish and bright colours.

 

[Legosa]

Has anyone tried to login via Mac OS X. Cannot login at all via Chrome, Safari or Firefox tonight.

 

[koeksGHT]

THIS!



Who is this they, FNB? How can you dismiss concerns when it was not thoroughly tested by not only FNB?

Prob tested by the developers lol..

Anyway.

 

[oober]

Yeap new site is horrible. Labels overlap. Textbox fonts are too big for the textbox.