General Photography

btw my D90 is not that fast - after all, it's just a 1/2frame
I often struggle with the D90 and my slow 3.5-5.6 zoom (the VR is only 1 stop - should have got the 18-200VR lol)
maybe I should get that 35mm1.8 hmmmm
It would be nice to have something above 1600 available to me.

/goes to look at the specs for the Canon EOS Rebel T1i . . .
 
Thing is if at all possible I want to avoid buying another APS-C sensor camera so I'm stuck in limbo atm.

I wasn't plugging APS-C - just pointing to what's possible with respect to higher ISO.

One thing I'll say is that the 50D is rather more sensitive to exposure with respect to noise. I can get exceptionally clean images but if I don't pay attention, I can get pretty noisy images too. I haven't really got the hang of it properly, but it's getting better.

I'm seriously hoping that, by the time I buy next body, the 5DmkIII will be out with a pop-up flash.
 
Just curious as to why you refer to it as 1/2 frame?? Relative to 35mm, it's 2/3 :confused:

remember, that if the D90 has a 1.5x multiplication factor, it means that the D90's sensor is half the size of 35mm/FF

does anybody know whether I'm talking rubbish?
 
does anybody know whether I'm talking rubbish?

Yes you are :)

1.5x means multiply by 1.5 to get a full frame. Or the camera in question is full frame divided by 1.5, which gives .06666666 - that confirms what bwana said: it's 2/3

The Olympus cams multiply by 2, so they are half size.
 
isn't the d90 sensor's area 1/2 that of 35mm?
aren't you confusing sensor size (area) with angle of view?
 
Yes you are :)

1.5x means multiply by 1.5 to get a full frame. Or the camera in question is full frame divided by 1.5, which gives .06666666 - that confirms what bwana said: it's 2/3

The Olympus cams multiply by 2, so they are half size.

I didn't say nuffin.
 
isn't the d90 sensor's area 1/2 that of 35mm?
aren't you confusing sensor size (area) with angle of view?

I guess I was. I looked it up though. The D90 has a 1.5x factor, right? Now check this:

D3: 36 x 24 mm (8.64 cm²)
D90: 23.6 x 15.8 mm (3.72 cm²)

So the surface is less than half! The diagonal might well be half, but I'm too lazy to work it out.

I didn't say nuffin.

Sorry, that was big-al
 
If only Nikon had a 24-105 f/4, I would consider putting up with the stupid button-wheel-thing and get a D700.
 
I have a dedicated flash. In fact, I have two. That's not the problem. My camera is not just a hobby. It goes with me to events like my company year-end party. I'm not the event photographer, I'm just taking it for my own snaps. On these occasions I don't want to fiddle about with an external flash. The camera is big enough. The pop-up flash is more than sufficient for such events.
 
Enough said! Completely understand that one.

Look, don't get me wrong. It's a labour of love. It's just that, on evenings like that, the aim is to have a great time, and it almost always involves some excessive boozing, so keeping it down to one device makes sense ;)
 
Look, don't get me wrong. It's a labour of love. It's just that, on evenings like that, the aim is to have a great time, and it almost always involves some excessive boozing, so keeping it down to one device makes sense ;)

I don't do the boozing, but when I go to family or friend events and pull out the SLR, battery grip, 24-105L and flash... I get strange looks - its also not easy to tuck it away and have some fun.
 
but when I go to family or friend events and pull out the SLR, battery grip, 24-105L and flash... I get strange looks - its also not easy to tuck it away and have some fun.

Yeah, that's the other thing. I can be reasonably inconspicuous with the camera alone. I don't like using the flash unless I have to, and I don't use the grip unless I need it for something.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X