A white bar owner in Omaha shot and killed a black protester. He won't face charges.
In response to outrage on social media, the county attorney said there was no "racial tone" to conversations between the shooter and the victim.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
OK I get that, but we know the knee didn't actually do anything.
What’s the relevance? Is it a contest to see who kills more or less? It’s just an odd thing to post.Is that really your takeaway from that image? This is not just about George Floyd anymore. Keep up.
![]()
A white bar owner in Omaha shot and killed a black protester. He won't face charges.
In response to outrage on social media, the county attorney said there was no "racial tone" to conversations between the shooter and the victim.www.cbsnews.com
Old Market Shooter Evicted; Bars Will Not Reopen
The Omaha bar owner involved in a deadly shooting during protests is being evicted. The "Omaha World Herald" reports that the property owner of The Hive and The Gatsby in the Old Market says the businesses will not be allowed to reopen and bar owner Jacob Gardner has been evicted. Gardner shot and killed 22-year-old James Scurlock on Saturday near 12th and Harney Streets. The Douglas County Attorney's Office announced this week that Gardner will not be charged at this time, and the shooting was ruled to be in self-defense.
At least it indicates that it is normal people buying guns. Not the Fudds and their 1911s.Not apparently. It's very difficult to get popular model Glocks in most places.
Not sure about ammo.
More than just neglect after reviewing the video again.What was the negligence though? Failing to recognise that he was in distress even before being put on the floor?
It's just so grey. I want to put the policemen in jail for ignoring the signs of distress, but at the same time...the act of arresting triggered a weak heart which wouldn't have been an issue for a normal human being.
Can you want someone to go to jail but also not, at the same time?
At least it indicates that it is normal people buying guns. Not the Fudds and their 1911s.
More than just neglect after reviewing the video again.
Floyd is supposedly drunk or high(they assume drunk. They push him into the police car on one side.
The the cop kneeling on his neck pull him out again on the other side for no apparent reason.
This was over the top heavy handedness.
Then he knees on the guy for 8 minutes just to proof he is the man or something? Pinning down a guy so drunk that he can hardly walk.
Then they fail to request medical assistance.
OK I get that, but we know the knee didn't actually do anything. At worst he should be fired for mishandling an arrest, right?
If we remove the knee from all this, as the autopsy has done. What did the policeman himself actually do wrong?
For sake of argument, as I'd like to know your response, he arrested this man properly.
This policeman does his job. Arrests a man who is a criminal and was perceived to be resisting, that man dies from a physical defect triggered by the act of being arrested which the policeman has to do. Is the policeman to blame? Is he really to blame for doing the thing he had to do?
This video shows everything leading up.
You can already see that Floyd is having his heart issues, when they remove him from his car, brought on by mental stress of possibly having to go to jail again. The issue is that, from a policeman's point of view this is just a man resisting attempts to get in the police car. Eventually they put him in the police car, and then is pulled out again by Chauvin. Why do 3 policemen get on him? Are they just doing it for fun? We're coming from the premise that they are just doing it to be toolbags and not to legitimately stop someone who they think is resisting putting him in the car. You could put this down to cops who are so jaded by "acting" and lying from arrests throughout their career, that they don't acknowledge the stress he shows early on as being real.
Negligence at most but murder?More than just neglect after reviewing the video again.
Floyd is supposedly drunk or high(they assume drunk. They push him into the police car on one side.
The the cop kneeling on his neck pull him out again on the other side for no apparent reason.
This was over the top heavy handedness.
Then he knees on the guy for 8 minutes just to proof he is the man or something? Pinning down a guy so drunk that he can hardly walk.
Then they fail to request medical assistance.
Definitely. Floyd is clearly drunk/high out of his mind. The police struggle to get him in the car and because of that the one macho man decides he is going to drag him out the other side again to teach him a lesson and basically purposely try and hurt him.Negligence at most but murder?
Hence it is mostly normal people looking to defend themselves.Nah I disagree. Glocks are decently popular enough to be bought by anyone looking for a first handgun. It's practically the opposite, they aren't being bought for sport at the moment.
There is no way these people will ever be satisfied.
https://medium.com/the-sword-and-shield/the-1911-is-for-fudds-352e572a7fdaElmer Fudd was the arch nemesis of Bugs Bunny, the star of the now historic Looney Tunes series of cartoons. Fudd is a slow witted hunter who is often foiled by simple tricks. First appearing in 1937, he has now become the de facto term of derision for Baby Boomer hunters and marksmen, clinging to outdated technology. This term of derision is also a contentious slur in the Gun Control debate, where hunters who side with Gun Control advocates are viewed as soft brained pacifists, undercutting their own hobby through an alliance with big city activists.
Of course it was ruled a homicide. It's the use of language. It wasn't a natural introduction of external mental stress. If a person walked into a room, and got surprised by people jumping from behind a cupboard, and then had a heart attack, that would be ruled a homicide...
A better example: If a policeman arrests you and you get worked up about it and then trigger your heart condition. That's a homicide and yet not the fault of the policeman though.
Yes, the line is literally saying that the act of arresting him, killed him. You know, the thing policemen have to do with a criminal. Those things added mental strain. The autopsy specifically clears up that the physical act of the knee on the neck did not contribute to his death physically.
"cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression."
You're more than welcome to read the autopsy.
So, I'm assuming the full autopsy with toxicology that came out last night just flew by you then, right?The act of arresting him with undue force is what killed him. After he literally told the guy on his neck that he can't breathe. You know, that very thing that keeps you alive? He told that cop that he can't do it, due to what the cop is doing to him, in the way that the cop is doing it to him.