Fair point.I'd say the arrest of a guy while being confronted by a crowd is pretty stressful , but it is different things.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Fair point.I'd say the arrest of a guy while being confronted by a crowd is pretty stressful , but it is different things.
No, they want to mumify and parade him around the country first so that everyone can have a chance to bow down to maasta.Checking in: Has Floyd been planted in the ground yet ?
Even the losing side should be allowed to honor their dead(not to divide but to acknowledge) , if we overlooked one bad aspect of one guy we need to do the same for others.
History is there for people to read and draw their own conclusions from. This is what civilization demands of people.
Of course, how else is the average rioter meant to watch the history channel if they don't have the latest 4K Sony Bavaria...The protests are a way of un-erasing history. Statues are not history, they are public symbols of values.
Of course, how else is the average rioter meant to watch the history channel if they don't have the latest 4K Sony Bavaria...
Statues are a part of human history. The values are whatever the public wish to place on them. If people didn't recognize them as part of history they would make them out of paper mache and burn them.
The Romans had slaves and were pretty nasty to just about everyone.
Protestors? They are nothing but common criminals.It is paint.
It will wash off.
It sends out a statement against Churchill's racism.
The obsession of everyone calling everyone they dislike as Antifa is hilarious.
The protestors are anti-racism protestors. They are protesting against racism, so of course highlighting one of Churchill's flaws is relevant to the protest.
I am a big Churchill supporter, after all he was the earliest pro-EU voice and advocated for its creation, but do feel that his racism needs to be known and recognised.
Anti-racist meaning all white people are racists.The protestors are anti-racism protestors. They are protesting against racism, so of course highlighting one of Churchill's flaws is relevant to the protest.
I don't like your posts. I think it allows me to tear you down. Is this the philosphy you live by?
The protests are a way of un-erasing history. Statues are not history, they are public symbols of values.
Embracing the History of Bristol
The transatlantic slave trade undoubtedly played a significant role in the growth of Bristol during the 18th century.
Today, Bristol continues to struggle with its past and with the profile of Edward Colston within the City. It is clear that we must address and acknowledge Bristol’s historic connection to the slave trade in a way that is illuminating and meaningful.
Whilst we cannot change the past, we can help to eradicate modern-slavery by educating the young people of Bristol about the abhorrence of slavery, both past and present. The Society of Merchant Venturers continually reviews the curriculum at each of our schools to ensure that students are confident, equipped and prepared for the responsibilities they have as global citizens.
By embracing the history of our city, we can all learn valuable lessons that will enable us to build a strong, fair and united future for Bristol, a city proud of its diversity and inclusivity.
The Society of Merchant Venturers is actively working with leaders across Bristol who share our commitment to improve the quality of life for all. Accurately remembering and appropriately acknowledging Bristol’s connection to the slave trade is a discussion we are driving forward with purpose.
The Romans had slaves and were pretty nasty to just about everyone.
So I guess you are on the side of ISIS then since blowing up their architecture is a fight against white supremacy.
Why the fixation with the past? How do you think this will improve people's lives now? How will tearing down a statue get someone a job? Teach them a new skill? What purpose does it actually serve? You can try and rewrite history a million times, it will not change tomorrow.I never said it did, but there's a fine line between vandalism and revolution. How you perceive this depends on what side of the fence you're sitting. Personally I'm not for tearing down Churchill statues, but I think some public reckoning with the uglier aspects of historical figures is necessary.
I don't like your posts. I think it allows me to tear you down. Is this the philosphy you live by?
Who gives a handful of protestors the right to decide for the rest of us? This is tyranny by criminals.
Why should it be moved if it affronts some? Why pander to people who is only interested in destruction?Just imagine if folk had just listened to other folk asking for an explanatory plaque on it, or for it to be moved to a museum.
Imagine it.
Why is that a strawman? Why should the stuff of one slave bearing society be respected and protected, whilst the stuff of another be destroyed and looted?What a pity the Colosseum isn't right in the middle of Rome, amirite?
Anyhoo, strawman away konfab.
Terry Crews actually taking flak for saying this.
Luckily he's standing by it. Good man.