South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
No statues no problem, tear them all down.Why should it be moved if it affronts some? Why pander to people who is only interested in destruction?
Mandela ordered the murder of innocents, should we not be tearing down his statues?
Look at his Twitter...or my comment?
Look at his Twitter...or my comment?
He's already made it clear he has no intention of doing so.
Why stop at statues, let's tear down the Vaal Dam wall. It was build by whites.No statues no problem, tear them all down.
Why should it be moved if it affronts some? Why pander to people who is only interested in destruction?
Mandela ordered the murder of innocents, should we not be tearing down his statues?
BSWhy should it be moved if it affronts some? Why pander to people who is only interested in destruction?
Mandela ordered the murder of innocents, should we not be tearing down his statues?
If it is public property then I don't see the problem with people wanting to waste their finite lives in organizing a democratic process to get it removed.Why should it be moved if it affronts some? Why pander to people who is only interested in destruction?
I agree with you on this."affronts some"
You're the arbiter of who can be affronted now?
Only you?
Revolution is vandalism and worse. It is also particularly stupid to be a revolutionary in a democracy,.I never said it did, but there's a fine line between vandalism and revolution. How you perceive this depends on what side of the fence you're sitting. Personally I'm not for tearing down Churchill statues, but I think some public reckoning with the uglier aspects of historical figures is necessary.
Armed struggle never happened? Must have missed that history erasure.
I agree with you on this.
Only Joe Biden is a suitable candidate for ultimately determining who the statue is an affront to.
That would be ludicrous, isn't it? Besides, Mandela was fighting the system and not white people. The struggle against apartheid was a struggle against the government and its policies.Oh right, because all white people were guilty.
Obfuscation. I called BS to the statement you made.Armed struggle never happened? Must have missed that history erasure.
Since we are airing our opinions/facts.
Was it a collective ANC decision or not?Obfuscation. I called BS to the statement you made.
Strawman.No it isn't actually.
History is there for people to read and draw their own conclusions from. This is what civilization demands of people.
What these fine upstanding "revolutionaries" want to do is wipe history out and start again anew. It is exactly the game played by ISIS, when they go and blow up statues.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_cultural_heritage_by_ISIL
You take away your enemy's history and you take away something that they can rally around.
It is the characteristic hallmark of every totalitarian society.
Public statues are publicly owned, which means that if people want to take them down, they have to follow a democratic process, not a mob process. Then the statue can be taken down and moved to somewhere more appropriate.
Roman architecture is not a statue. Strawman.The Romans had slaves and were pretty nasty to just about everyone.
So I guess you are on the side of ISIS then since blowing up their architecture is a fight against white supremacy.
Why should it be moved if it affronts some? Why pander to people who is only interested in destruction?
Mandela ordered the murder of innocents, should we not be tearing down his statues?