How difficult it is to put a turbo on a large 6 cylinder engine and a RWD drive train...
It must suck that most of the 2.0 cars are faster than the BMW.
Say what? It must suck that you have no clue (again) as to what you are talking about
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
How difficult it is to put a turbo on a large 6 cylinder engine and a RWD drive train...
It must suck that most of the 2.0 cars are faster than the BMW.
It must suck that most of the 2.0 cars are faster than the BMW.
Pssst - name a few of these "most" 2.0 cars that are faster than the BMW.
Displacement is not everything. The next Astra OPC will be a 1.6 and will be better than these VAGs.I'm sure the S3 will give yours a run for it's money, and it's a 2.0l. A very impressive 2.0l![]()
Displacement is not everything. The next Astra OPC will be a 1.6 and will be better than these VAGs.
Aren't F1 cars around that sort of displacement these days as well? It sure looks like they go fast as all ****.
Weight is everything.
Why did nobody suggest a New Audi TT to the OP? Same chassis
Yeah, I get that they have a fantastic power to weight ratio, but it still serves the lower displacement argument, especially with something like the new Peugeot mentioned?
2-door.
I'm sure the S3 will give yours a run for it's money, and it's a 2.0l. A very impressive 2.0l![]()
I think you mean "parts".
- Smaller engine : Well, should I disagree with this, or should I just say "duh"?
- Better performance : How so? My car does 0-100Kms in 4.8. What car you talking about?
- Better gearbox : As I said earlier; you appear to be delirious. This has been mentioned a few times in this thread already (as in the ZF wins hands down).
- Better fuel consumption : Well, I would fricking hope so dude! Then again, what with the recent revelations about VW cheating on things including fuel consumption you would be stupid to believe their numbers.
- Better drive train : totally subjective.
Anyway, I thought we were talking about your awesome wisdom as to why there were 4 exhaust pipes needed?
Yoo hoo, @Rusty - waiting for your pearls of wisdom!
I think you mean "parts".
- Smaller engine : Well, should I disagree with this, or should I just say "duh"?
- Better performance : How so? My car does 0-100Kms in 4.8. What car you talking about?
- Better gearbox : As I said earlier; you appear to be delirious. This has been mentioned a few times in this thread already (as in the ZF wins hands down).
- Better fuel consumption : Well, I would fricking hope so dude! Then again, what with the recent revelations about VW cheating on things including fuel consumption you would be stupid to believe their numbers.
- Better drive train : totally subjective.
Anyway, I thought we were talking about your awesome wisdom as to why there were 4 exhaust pipes needed?
It wasnt about fuel consumption, it was about emissions.
Don't hold your breath. With people like him it's all about the dyno and robot to robot. These same people consider themselves knowledgeable and expert drivers...
I think you mean "parts".
- Smaller engine : Well, should I disagree with this, or should I just say "duh"?
- Better performance : How so? My car does 0-100Kms in 4.8. What car you talking about?
- Better gearbox : As I said earlier; you appear to be delirious. This has been mentioned a few times in this thread already (as in the ZF wins hands down).
- Better fuel consumption : Well, I would fricking hope so dude! Then again, what with the recent revelations about VW cheating on things including fuel consumption you would be stupid to believe their numbers.
- Better drive train : totally subjective.
Anyway, I thought we were talking about your awesome wisdom as to why there were 4 exhaust pipes needed?