South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
It's a business - advertising pays for a lot of things...
Besides, ad's are easily skimmed past; and there are rather few of them. Put on pause, go have a crap and then you have plenty of buffer to FF with
The only thing that really grates my carrot is the long gap between certain episodes that are fulled with promo's of upcoming or current shows. I need to have a long poo to be able to FF past these.
The rights that they have bought legally (and in an open market) are because the competition were pathetic. Any good business would have done the same.
Are you happy paying for content AND ads?
No, it's because there was NO competition. When did DSTV get their pay TV license, and when did Top TV get theirs? There were all sorts of dirty tactics employed to ensure that DSTV could gain an unfair advantage over any future players...
I get why the writers are defending the work.
and I know I cannot write a better article myself, me spelling and grammar is terrible.
Despite the content of this article being a sore point and my nearly 100 points of rep for calling you on it suggesting the forum agrees.
just do us a favor. one tiny little article on how to cut the cord. how to not miss out AND not be a pirate. that is all we are asking for.
and please please please get a language editor. I know for a fact that 3 professional language editors have sent you their CV's those are just the ones that I told about the openings. that you guys advertised.
remember in the "how to improve myBB" thread, I said something. and then I realized I was wrong, this was about openweb. did I go back and admit I was wrong?
all we are asking for, is one article on how to LEGALLY cut the cord. and the best part is, all the legwork has been done. in this forum.
Does DSTV pay themselves to advertise themselves to much on DSTV?
The sarcasms was directed at the claim that the article is the reason we do not have 5G in the country - which is ridiculous. Nothing more.
In terms of criticisms of the article, we are open to that and always take feedback on board.
The problem comes when false claims like "this is pad for" and "MyBB is a DStv shill" are made.
If someone thinks the article is poor, then say "Man, this is a terrible article, completely disagree. Here's why I think streaming, pirating, etc is better."
To make false claims and then attack us when we refute them is not constructive. If anyone wants to criticize the article as an article, then fair play.
And again, why was there no competition at the time?
And what dirty tactics?
Don't bring logic into a DSTV bashing thread... It's not wanted here, they want to believe DSTV is a monopoly and have government handouts and are corrupt. Not a business that managed to secure rights by buying them, the competition couldn't afford the rights so they suffered, or they could only secure the rights to previous seasons cause of cost.
Same as sport, the sport rights are sold to the highest bidder, there is nothing funny going on, they just can afford it. Oh also that for the first couple of years MNet struggled to actually survive, as the competition (SABC and BopTV) actually showed decent shows. That's why there was open time.
you can stream sport in a bad quality for free on lots of free online streams and there is also kodi for beter qualitySteven, DSTV has one draw card, and only one. That is Supersport. Everything else about it is absolute rubbish.
Maybe you should take it up with ICASA, or do some research, or maybe Kevin can write a useful article on it (although I wouldn't get my hopes up given the way things are looking). But I'm not going to provide you with a list of events of the past 20 years of history as I have better things to do with my time...![]()
The sarcasms was directed at the claim that the article is the reason we do not have 5G in the country - which is ridiculous. Nothing more.
In terms of criticisms of the article, we are open to that and always take feedback on board.
The problem comes when false claims like "this is paid for" and "MyBB is a DStv shill" are made.
If someone thinks the article is poor, then say "Man, this is a terrible article, completely disagree. Here's why I think streaming, pirating, etc is better."
To make false claims and then attack us when we refute them is not constructive. If anyone wants to criticize the article as an article, then fair play.
This will end up in a massive debate as to the definition of "legally". If we decide that the only "legal" options are via providers that are licensed to provide content in SA then the article writes itself - Netflix and Showmax.all we are asking for, is one article on how to LEGALLY cut the cord. and the best part is, all the legwork has been done. in this forum.