Hamish McPanji
Honorary Master
Tell me where this is a requirement in SA - the world I live in?
You have to return the goods that you received. Without the packaging, you are not returning what you received.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Tell me where this is a requirement in SA - the world I live in?
Please Google the CPA
Read item 2 on this page: http://www.michalsons.co.za/returns-under-the-consumer-protection-act/9191
I enjoy a debate it must be said
But I do not dive into debates unless I believe I am right. I might still be wrong - but that is why we debate, not so?![]()
So do I
Makes life interesting
Did you read all of it?
I don't think this is fair on anybody. How on earth would retailers keep track of people trying to return things fraudulently if this was the case? I am a consumer but if you just accept products without looking if it is what you ordered then you're just asking for trouble.
Read item 4.
Just because someone is "entitled to" under item 2 does not negate item 4.
Wanna place a bet on it?![]()
Yes I did and I also have the CPA and the company policy (in compliance with the CPA) on returns back at work.
I do however see it very interesting that the OP established that Ikonic blamed their supplier as per customer relations... Argh... Unethical in my opinion.
Read item 4.
Just because someone is "entitled to" under item 2 does not negate item 4.
Wanna place a bet on it?![]()
How is it fraudulent if you find that the 3TB drive you ordered was a 2TB drive? I order quite a lot of high value electronic goods, and if any retailer insisted that a return only applies if I kept the packaging there would be ruptions....
PS - anyone remember my "WARNING" thread about the buzzing noise of my Samsung 64"E8000?![]()
Am good Muslim who does not bet.
But if I did sign off on some goods with a big friggin box like that , and didn't check I would put it down to a learning experience and check properly next time. That is after trying to wangle with the company a bit.
I think the op is being a little silly in his titling of this thread, as he also should accept some blame for not resolving it
I think we must make a distinction between some things here. If the product was indistinguishable from the correct one that was ordered I would agree with you. However most new products are not unless it's some sketchy company trying to screw you (like putting a 2TB drive in a 3TB box).
If you receive the product clearly marked as something you didn't order then proceed to use it for a month and throw away the box, well this is going a bit far.
Read again - according to the OP he only tried to use it a month later. And the frikkin box/packaging is irrellevant man. It has no basis in law.
Sorry, but maybe I'm old school but if you don't check things that you've paid a lot of money for when receiving them then I don't really have much sympathy. If however as I said earlier, if the product came boxed in the incorrect box and there was absolutely no way to tell until it was plugged in then I would understand.
You NEVER throw away packaging when the item is under warranty.
You must always check that you have received the correct products when ordering from online stores.
You NEVER throw away packaging when the item is under warranty.
You must always check that you have received the correct products when ordering from online stores.
Note to self: send out circular to sales team, Do not sell any goods to fat lazy accountants. Just tell him the goods are permenantly out of stock and give him competitors phone number