Iran goes nuclear

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Reaction score
17
Location
South Africa.
Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant connected to national grid
Iran's Bushehr nuclear power station, file pic from 2009 The reactor's generating unit at Bushehr began operating at a low level in May


Iran's first nuclear power station has been connected to the country's electricity grid, state news reports.

Bushehr was supplying 60 megawatts of its 1,000 megawatt capacity to the national grid, officials said.

The reactor's generating unit began operating at a low level in May, prompting Israel and other nations to express fears the reactor could help Iran develop nuclear weapons.

Tehran says its intentions are purely peaceful.

But the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said it is "increasingly concerned" that Iran is also secretly working on components for a nuclear weapons programme.
Dogged by delays

Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said the plant in the country's south was connected to the national grid at 23:30 (19:00 GMT) on Saturday.

The connection had initially been scheduled for late last year but, as with developments at Bushehr since the project began in the 1970s, it was dogged by delays.

Construction on the plant was abandoned after Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution until the mid-1990s, when Moscow reached a billion-dollar deal with Tehran to complete it.

In February, Iran had to remove fuel from the reactor "for technical reasons", amid speculation that the Stuxnet computer virus may have been responsible.

The United States and other Western nations for years urged Russia to abandon the project, warning it could help Iran build atomic weapons.

But an agreement obliging Tehran to repatriate spent nuclear fuel to Russia eased those concerns.

In February, an IAEA report obtained by the BBC and made available online by the Institute for Science and International Security (Isis) - said Iran was "not implementing a number of its obligations."

These included "clarification of the remaining outstanding issues which give rise to concerns about possible military dimensions to its nuclear programme".

Six world powers are negotiating with Iran over its nuclear programme, and the country is subject to United Nations Security Council sanctions over its refusal to halt uranium enrichment.

Enriched uranium can be used for civilian nuclear purposes, but also to build atomic bombs.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14779227

Good on Russia for not listening to the powers that be regarding this issue.
 
No reason why they can't have a nuclear power station. People already realise that coal/gas/oil power is not sufficent never mind highly polluting. With the spent deal with Russia it should be fine.
 
Good for them. If we can find suitable locations (not at Cape St Francis) then we need to start building ours immediately.
 
You're evidently unaware of Iran's Ahmadinejad often repeated mantra that Israel must be wiped off the map thus heralding the return of the Mahdi and the resulting Armageddon.

When people tell you what they want to do, believe them!
I am aware of it.

Here... here's your hat:
tinfoil.gif
 
No reason why they can't have a nuclear power station. People already realise that coal/gas/oil power is not sufficent never mind highly polluting. With the spent deal with Russia it should be fine.

Exactly. Good for Iran. Despite the bad press Iran gets at least the country is improving the life of its people with innovations like these. I think they are also doing some amazing things relating to Stem Cell research.

Lets hope the US/EU doesn't go Libya on them.
 
Iran having anything nuclear is dangerous and unacceptable but hey lets just wait for her to get her own nuke weapons and then we will see what you all have to say :rolleyes:
 
Iran having anything nuclear is dangerous and unacceptable but hey lets just wait for her to get her own nuke weapons and then we will see what you all have to say :rolleyes:
You could say that for quite a few countries... as long as they use it for peaceful purposes, then no problem.
 
Why don't you use the internet and do some research for yourself :whistle:

Why don't you grow up and learn the difference between facts and whatever **** pops into your head? Adults are able to support own statements with references etc.
 
He wants nuclear WEAPONS to wipe Israel OFF THE MAP thus heralding the return of the Mahdi.
If it did bother me then I would be far more concerned about North Korea, India and Pakistan's nuclear arsenals, seeing that they have not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
 
Why don't you grow up and learn the difference between facts and whatever **** pops into your head? Adults are able to support own statements with references etc.

So I'm presuming you never bothered to check the link on my original post? Not very "adult" of you what. There are a myriad of links from that article. READ THEM.
 
As Mickey says, there others actually WITH nuclear weapons I'd be far more concerned about. Should the world not allow afghanistan fertiliser for their crops because it CAN be used for explosives?
 
As Mickey says, there others actually WITH nuclear weapons I'd be far more concerned about. Should the world not allow afghanistan fertiliser for their crops because it CAN be used for explosives?

Nuclear weapons in the hands of man who wants to end the world thus heralding the return of an iman who lives in a well is hardly comparable to afghan fertiliser bombs, surely?
 
So I'm presuming you never bothered to check the link on my original post? Not very "adult" of you what. There are a myriad of links from that article. READ THEM.

I see no reference to a "often repeated mantra that Israel must be wipe off the map" in that 6 year old article.
 
Nuclear weapons in the hands of man who wants to end the world thus heralding the return of an iman who lives in a well is hardly comparable to afghan fertiliser bombs, surely?

What is the only country to have ever used them?
What is country that has the most?

Hint, the first 2 questions have the same answer

I think you are a very good example for a media brainwashed kiddie, i bet you still think saddam has nukes right?

There is a big difference between a nuke and power station, if iran wants nukes i am sure north korea would be more than willing to give them a few.

Shows how the media can brainwash people, that is why i try to watch a bit of rt and aljazeera so i don't end up a brainwashed cnn addict :D
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X