Whatsapp, BBM etc are slowly dying. These are effectively closed networks. If anyone asks me, I suggest a gmail account with a gtalk client. XMPP is the way forward! Even MXit has interfaces for gtalk/MSN etc. Closed networks suck!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
You use your mobile network for data? Strange....the issue with whatsapp is : no 3g no message.
Why is WhatsApp getting so much coverage? It's no different from any other IM app on your phone, including Mixit, Fring, Google Talk, etc. It's not new, what's the big deal? Or am I missing something?
The one drawback to WhatsApp is that not everyone is using it
MXits days are over for anyone who owns a smartphone and isnt a paedophile
Whatsapp, BBM etc are slowly dying. These are effectively closed networks. If anyone asks me, I suggest a gmail account with a gtalk client. XMPP is the way forward! Even MXit has interfaces for gtalk/MSN etc. Closed networks suck!
Whatsapp, BBM etc are slowly dying. These are effectively closed networks. If anyone asks me, I suggest a gmail account with a gtalk client. XMPP is the way forward! Even MXit has interfaces for gtalk/MSN etc. Closed networks suck!
Why the focus on whatsapp? Why does it get a mention relative to any other app. Mxit has been around for ever, bbm is really pumping and even MTN and Vodacom launched their own im platforms.
None of these will really take off until 1) the apps can talk to each other and you can send messages across platforms and 2) you can know with reasonable certain that the person receiving the message will get it and almost immediately and 3) uses phone numbers and not handles (as this one does, adimittedly).
Why the focus on whatsapp? Why does it get a mention relative to any other app. Mxit has been around for ever, bbm is really pumping and even MTN and Vodacom launched their own im platforms.
None of these will really take off until 1) the apps can talk to each other and you can send messages across platforms and 2) you can know with reaonable certain that the person receiving the message will get it and almost immediately and 3) uses phone numbers and not handles (as this one does, adimittedly).
Any 'community' group that uses a current solution will save a lot of money because it is a couple of people who know each other, are on the same platform and send each other a lot of messages. However these communities will come and go and won't be either sustainable in the long term or grow to nearly the extent SMS has
1) It does this
2) It has 2 status indicators, one so show you it's sent and 2nd to show you the user received is
3) uses phone no. not handles.
Whatsapp is nothing like MIXIT, it does not run only when you open it's it's always active and runs in the background and you don't have to logon, in comparison it exactly like SMS but instead of using the carries SMS network and being charge 50C per SMS it uses the data network. I have tested this for the past 6 months and in comparison I can send 50 msg from Whatsapp for the same cost as 1 SMS that include receiving msg's.
It's in direct competition with BBM only thing its not restricted to BlackBerry, and as there is more take on more platforms will become available.
Simple it's Brilliant.
Whatsapp, BBM etc are slowly dying. These are effectively closed networks. If anyone asks me, I suggest a gmail account with a gtalk client. XMPP is the way forward! Even MXit has interfaces for gtalk/MSN etc. Closed networks suck!