And what's gratuitous display? There's already talk now that if you have one in your home you better remove it when someone comes over so as not to offend. This is an empty ruling. The judge did refer to discussion but the only discussion now is around when and where the flag can be displayed and not around the actual flag. There was more discussion before this ruling. People were actually discussing what the flag meant to individuals. What does it mean to the guy with the old flag, new flag and other flags in his bar? What does it mean to ou Sarel who's father told him about how they flew it while raiding British camps?I think old toppies here should just chill as "This order is not a banning order against the old flag, says judge"
Order is specific against gratuitous display of flag. No one is coming after your bedsheets and check your cupboards and confiscate your joy and pride.
These are the discussions we should be having rather than pandering to a few SJW wusses who only see things in their own light. Sadly banning it will stifle these discussions.
Old one or new one?and yet we have 9 pages of people "fighting" about a piece of shitty cloth
It goes deeper than just a flag. That's what's offending.If the banning of the old flag offends you, it is only because you let it offend you![]()
What will banning it achieve? And don't say nothing unless you're invested in it.What do you think keeping the old flag will achieve?
I wonder, will there be people who still fly the old-new flag then?Time to design a flag that we can all relate to.....maybe just incorporate all the old flags colours...?


