Foxhound5366
Honorary Master
Honestly guys, everybody complaining on here who is paying money to RPM for their access to this forum, please raise your hands.
What, nobody? How surprising.
As I'm sure you all already know (although many appear to be trying to pretend they don't), there is such a thing as the commercial reality of running a business like this. Part of this is generating clicks through provocative headlines, because more website visitors = more attractive to external advertisers (i.e. good for the forum).
By that very same token, people slagging off the journalist, story or advertisers in the comments is bad for the forum, because advertisers generally don't want to expose their brand to that sort of thing and will go elsewhere very happily.
RPM and the MyBB team are stuck in the middle: giving all of you this big playground where you are empowered to communicate, while at the same time trying to judiciously apply the brakes on what you say before it hurts the forum.
TLDR version: it's like the real world. Do what is good for the tribe. Harm the tribe and get voted off the island.
PS: I for one enjoyed that Makro story and can't figure what you guys are on about. Just because some of you have admitted you arrived on the story craving something negative (and that impression was never given in the headline - you just hoped to find it), you're horribly disappointed and raving about how it must be advertorial (because anything that makes Makro look good must be advertising - good service doesn't actually really exist in South Africa, does it)? Think for a second guys: good news does still exist, and I for one found that story interesting because I've seen the Makro containers around but never seen a story describing their use.
What, nobody? How surprising.
As I'm sure you all already know (although many appear to be trying to pretend they don't), there is such a thing as the commercial reality of running a business like this. Part of this is generating clicks through provocative headlines, because more website visitors = more attractive to external advertisers (i.e. good for the forum).
By that very same token, people slagging off the journalist, story or advertisers in the comments is bad for the forum, because advertisers generally don't want to expose their brand to that sort of thing and will go elsewhere very happily.
RPM and the MyBB team are stuck in the middle: giving all of you this big playground where you are empowered to communicate, while at the same time trying to judiciously apply the brakes on what you say before it hurts the forum.
TLDR version: it's like the real world. Do what is good for the tribe. Harm the tribe and get voted off the island.
PS: I for one enjoyed that Makro story and can't figure what you guys are on about. Just because some of you have admitted you arrived on the story craving something negative (and that impression was never given in the headline - you just hoped to find it), you're horribly disappointed and raving about how it must be advertorial (because anything that makes Makro look good must be advertising - good service doesn't actually really exist in South Africa, does it)? Think for a second guys: good news does still exist, and I for one found that story interesting because I've seen the Makro containers around but never seen a story describing their use.
Last edited: