Point taken, the idea was to actually help with load on the call desk and the idea is still valid. But 30 (or 100) clicks was way too agressive. I've asked the guys that we try and change it to one per day as a 'quick fix' and we can then look at an opt-out.
Makes sense?
No.
iBurst Browser Hijacking & more.
Browser Hijacking:
Quote:
Browser hijacking is the modification of a web browser's settings by malware. The term "hijacking" is used as the changes are performed without the user's permission. Some browser hijacking can be easily reversed, while other instances may be difficult to reverse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_hijacking
Quote:
Browser hijacking is a type of online fraud. Scammers use malicious software to take control of your computer's Internet browser and change how and what it displays when you're surfing the Web.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect/terms/hijacking.aspx
Quote:
One of the biggest factors in mitigating the risk of browser hijacking is our behavior as we browse the net. We should avoid suspicious and dangerous web sites.
http://www.brighthub.com/computing/s...les/28473.aspx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keeper View Post
the thing that jannie needs to understand is that nag screens are not going to get users to buy boosters, but cheaper topup's - like what Afrihost did.
as for letting the users know they are capped?
send an e-mail, that's all that is needed. every 100 clicks is just a bit much if you ask me...
So how excatly were these "Nag Sreens" implemented?- Technically that is?
Browser Hijacking via visiting the iBurst web site?
Software downloaded into the users OS without their Knowledge?
Monitoring the number of HTTP requests via the iBurst network and then sending back something the user did not request?
The *software* dev team seems to have a lot of time on their hands...
Are they in a 'dilemma' too?
EDIT: Remember SONY and their software they installed on user's PC's without their knowledge? And it going to the top of DIGG?
Quote:
Sony's infamous rootkit based DRM software has been at the center of much attention for the last few week. That are facing a class action lawsuit. In the face of serious consumer backlash they recently decided to withdraw their copy-protected cd's which compromises the security of users. Now it appears Sony is headed for more troubled waters on multiple fronts.
http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/a...ource-license/
Quote:
It's over. The last major label to hold out on selling DRM-free MP3s, Sony BMG, is "finalizing plans" to sell music not locked down with DRM. It'll be available sometime in the first quarter, apparently in time to get in on Amazon and Pepsi's 1 billion song giveaway
http://digg.com/tech_news/DRM_Offici...ns_to_Drop_DRM
Consider the following:
IBoss is taking ALL priority at iBurst at the moment.
Implementation started at 14-17 August.
ETA was 17/18 August.
Sotware Devs must be having very little sleep as iBoss is now well beyond the 17th August deadline.
Some *Devs* have had time to implement the 'Prepaid offer' with crazy pricing in the meantime. (Could that time not have been used to fix iBoss? Unless this order came from the CEO or one of his lackeys...)
Some *Devs* have had time to implement the 'Nag screens' in the meantime. (Could that time not have been used to fix iBoss? Unless this order came from the CEO or one of his lackeys...)