Qouted my responses from the main article post.
Yep number shuffle thats all it is.
I used to just download what i needed (well as far as i got on my cap) and then just use the throttled 64k for basic needs.
Changing over to the new package i have to micro manage my download sizes with a dashboard that doesnt work 99% of the time otherwise i end up without internet.
I think ill just stay on my current package as it would work out more expensive to go for the new 5GB + 64k uncapped than what i am currently paying.
Current package 5GB + 64k uncapped
Old price ( R 599 )
New price ( R 592 + R199 )
EPIC FAILURE !!!
Quote:
iBurst – which has around 80,000 broadband subscribers – announced today that it is increasing its data bundle sizes and significantly reducing its out-of-bundle and booster rates. Data bundles increase by between 50 to 100% while Top-Ups will drop by as much as 96%.
Looks like iburst actaully just became more expensive .
YOUR NUMBER SHUFFLE FAILS TO ACHIEVE ANYTHING.
All you did was make out of bundle cheaper at the cost of taking away the 64k throttled.
The whole reason iburst was appealing was the never get hard capped option.
Now you want to make that a payable feature , when that has always been part of iburst?
So in short this fails to impress me.
This helps me in no way at all. On the contrary i would be paying more than i am now for exactly the same product.
You can certainly stay on your current package if it works better for you.
In your example above you actually get 3GB more data for a few bucks less.
Jannie i understand what you are saying but the truth is that i can do more than 3GB on the 64k if i wanted to , it would just take a bit longer.
This is just encouraging me to race through my cap asap and then just let the pc download 24/7 from the 3rd of the month right through till the end of the month at throttled .
Why is it encouraging me to do that you may ask ... well because I would be getting value for money than the new packages and i dont have to worry about micro managing my internet usage and that ill get disconnected completely.
so quick math (correct me if im wrong )
27 days
24 hours in a day
60 minutes in an hour
60 seconds in a minute
@ 6kb
27 x 24 x 60 x 60 x 6 = 13996800 kb
13996800 / 1024 = 13668.75 MB
13668.75 /1024 = 13.348 Gb theoretically possible on 64k downloading 24/7 over 27 days .
Stay on old package (theorectically)
13.348 GB + 5GB
New package
3 GB + 5GB
Which one looks more worth it ?
Someone correct me if im wrong please ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will soon add a flat-rate unthrottled, uncapped after hour service which might work even better for these guys.
That might get me excited ... ETA on this ?
Will it be a stand alone product or bolt on product.
Maybe both with the bolt on obviously being a bit cheaper than the stand alone ?
Jannie`s response to this :
Soon, need to finish of some back-end development.
It will be a nice VAS for those who do bulk file transfers in the background.