Nikon vs Canon: Which do you prefer?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are only starting join photographic club, it helped me greatly.

Nah, specialised in photojournalism at University for two years and I've had my photos critiqued enough. I'm not trying to please anybody else now, just myself. I took a few years without touching a camera outside of my cellphone camera and I'm now trying to reverse that and get back to having fun.
 
Oh Foxhound, you missed a few slides in trolling class. You're supposed to bait us in by seeming stupid, not actually being stupid. The difference is subtle, but it's there.
 
Oh you guys, so quick with the insults, so slow with the evidence to support whatever you claim.

Keep it up, really.

So far I'm the only person to talk about Canon Vs Nikon in terms of the actual output (complete with examples of my own photography) and all some idiots can do is tear that apart rather than post their own views to the contrary and then back them up with their own photos.

I'm stupid for continually engaging with these people and hoping they'll show more depth next time around, completely.
 
So far I'm the only person to talk about Canon Vs Nikon in terms of the actual output (complete with examples of my own photography) and all some idiots can do is tear that apart rather than post their own views to the contrary and then back them up with their own photos.

i think that's what is sparking most of the responses...
 
I have Nikon, but would keen to try Canon. I guess use whatever works for you. I think I'd like to get a Sony A6300 though.
 
I have Nikon, but would keen to try Canon. I guess use whatever works for you. I think I'd like to get a Sony A6300 though.

Just watch out as there isn't much of a Sony presence in SA. If anything happens to it the procedure to sort it out might be an expensive schlep.
 
Great thread, despite the acrimony, read it from beginning to end.

I am a pro-sumer user (Canon SX-60), and certainly not anywhere near to professional so my opinion on camera brand, features, glass, quality, RAW, flash and post processing has no standing here whatsoever.

But I did find the thread instructive, so thanks FoxHound for your original post.
 
I see this thread got revived. I honestly, lol'd a bit (ok, a lot).

Anyway, despite being made to feel unwelcome in the thread, here's my attempt at a conciliatory contribution. I'm not a professional photographer by a long shot, and haven't had the privilege of studying photo-journalism or photography. I'm a hobbyist, who takes pictures for personal pleasure. Over the years, with a hobby that's spanned nearly 20 years (I owned the first Sony Mavica digital camera that saved to floppy disk!), I've shot with Nikon, Sony, Canon, Apple iPhone and now with Sony mirrorless.

The best looking pictures, for me, were the ones I took when I was enjoying myself with the tool I happened to be using. Most times, these were with Canon... particularly when I first stepped up from a pro-sumer point-and-shoot to a DSLR in 2005. Currently it's with a Sony A6000 mirrorless. But I've had great times shooting with Nikon and the iPhone brings opportunities to take photographic creativity to a different place.

I have also, over the years, had the surprising privilege of being contacted from time to time, to have some of my pictures published. Years ago, it was when my pics were up on Flickr. More recently, the approaches come via Instagram or Facebook. There aren't many of them, about 15-20 in total, but enough to make me feel validated and enthusiastic about the hobby. Mostly, they have been published by by SA Tourism, some by Cape Town Magazine, and, since earlier this year, at least one international tourism company exclusively uses my Cape Town pictures.

I'm a 100% wannabe... so whenever I get contacted to have one of my pictures published or used, it's a bit of a surprise. I see all the technical flaws and am aware of all the "better" pictures of the subject I may have attempted to capture. Yet, for some reason, there's that wonderful validation when someone else feels *your* picture is worthy. What it has reinforced, is that a "good looking picture" is always contested, and is always a matter of personal taste, often influenced by the emotion it may trigger in the eyes of the viewer. It has nothing to do with the brand on the instrument you happen to be using at the time... Nikon, Canon, Sony even a smartphone are equally capable of taking a breath-taking shot.

Below is a sprinkling of some pictures that have either been published or featured online in some way, other than my own instagram feed. They've been taken with Canon (mostly), Sony (a few), Nikon and an iPhone 7. All pictures are taken in RAW and processed in Lightroom. I'm deliberately not attaching any picture to a camera brand, to underscore the point, that a good picture (or crappy, depending on how you see these) can be taken with any camera.

More importantly, this is a hobby that brings great personal pleasure to self, and joy to others. It's not deserving of the kind of acrimony displayed in this thread. We should all be out there shooting, taking pictures with smartphones, with point & shoots, with DSLRs, Nikons, Canons, Sonys, or whatever happens to bring enjoyment.

A Nikon vs Canon debate is a superfluous. The more you're enjoying what you're doing, the more great pictures, you will take. And the more you will respect the pictures taken by others. If anyone wants to get into photography these days, and wants to learn to take good pictures, I would share with them my own personal experience, and that is that is I am having the most fun and enjoyment with Sony's mirrorless system. I appreciate and respect that others may find their enjoyment elsewhere. Enjoyment matters.

_MG_2101-Edit-Edit.jpg

View attachment 426150

_DSC0843-Edit.jpg

IMG_0255-Edit-2.jpg

_DSC0851-Edit.jpg

IMG_7679-Edit.jpg

IMG_0237-Edit-2-2.jpg
 
Easy with the clarity and saturation sliders there boet.
 
An acquaintance owns a small camera store, and swears by Sony mirrorless, loves Canon and hates Nikon with a passion (something about their lenses and how they're all about marketing and don't really give a **** about their customers). I've owned a Canon (just as a hobby, no wild aspirations of being a pro photographer), but think I'll give the Sonys a try next time round.
 
Last edited:
Easy with the clarity and saturation sliders there boet.

Thanks for the pro-tip :D . Since I'm not a pro, I honestly capture and edit for my own personal taste (which has evolved over the years), then see what happens. I like my pics punchy and somewhat saturated. I'm sure others hate it (in the same way that some love Canon and hate Nikon, or love B&W but hate colour). My pics from 10 years ago, look nothing like the pics I take today. If the peeps who publish my pics asked me to change it, I probably wouldn't either, since it's a 100% self-indulgence.

My 2c, it shouldn't be about the sliders, the brand, your personal colour preference vs someone else's... unless, of course, pixel peeping pays the bills. It should be about inner satisfaction and personal enjoyment. The rest will take care of itself, irrespective of which way you push the sliders.
 
Great thread, despite the acrimony, read it from beginning to end.

I am a pro-sumer user (Canon SX-60), and certainly not anywhere near to professional so my opinion on camera brand, features, glass, quality, RAW, flash and post processing has no standing here whatsoever.

But I did find the thread instructive, so thanks FoxHound for your original post.

The one voice in the wilderness, thanks :) I do it for peeps like you.

And sybawoods, again with the attempted hijacking? You know there is another thread on here with a general "post your pics" theme? You're horribly off-topic here because you don't shoot either Canon or Nikon, so all your post is a attempt for validation and never mind what other people are discussing. I salute your passion for photography, but you are adding nothing here.
 
And sybawoods, again with the attempted hijacking? You know there is another thread on here with a general "post your pics" theme? You're horribly off-topic here because you don't shoot either Canon or Nikon, so all your post is a attempt for validation and never mind what other people are discussing.

So far I'm the only person to talk about Canon Vs Nikon in terms of the actual output (complete with examples of my own photography)

Doh! Tried to assist by posting output with both camera brands, but it looks like you've made your mind up about the kind of cheer-leading you prefer in this thread. You might as well only ask for opinions that validate your pre-existing view. Way to broaden your horizon. Anyway, I've just wasted 10mins of my life looking up some of your other other contributions on this forum. You're quite the stirrer, I see. Way to make friends and influence people. Maybe you should turn that camera inwards a bit. You may be surprised what you see. Over and out.
 
Doh! Tried to assist by posting output with both camera brands, but it looks like you've made your mind up about the kind of cheer-leading you prefer in this thread. You might as well only ask for opinions that validate your pre-existing view. Way to broaden your horizon. Anyway, I've just wasted 10mins of my life looking up some of your other other contributions on this forum. You're quite the stirrer, I see. Way to make friends and influence people. Maybe you should turn that camera inwards a bit. You may be surprised what you see. Over and out.

Sybawoods, you do realise that posting a shed-load of your own photographs without identifying which one is from which camera is useless? Especially not when you've edited each to the point of death in Photoshop. Nobody is arguing that anybody can take good photos on either Nikon OR Canon, I started this thread to determine exactly where which of those two camera systems outperforms the other (and some of that is going to be purely subjective - but along the way I've listed a few well-known objective differences as well). You can come down off your high horse and recognise that you tried to ram home your own self-centric philosophy ("Nikon vs Canon doesn't matter: I take photos that I like because I like them"), so it's incredibly rich for you to try to turn that onto me now. If you can't contribute anything on-topic with photos straight off the camera sensor and a description of what you think those photos show about the relative merits of Canon or Nikon, then please do just stay out this time around mkay? Otherwise, welcome back in.
 
A feeling of "I've just taken a crap photo"?

I really don't get how an abysmal example of a poor photo is being used as an example of something good in a camera :confused:.

That photo is not that bad, get off your high horse.

Jirre as far as I know there's only one professional photographer in this thread and you don't see him critique with such disdain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X