Excalibur
Executive Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5,622
- Reaction score
- 1,782
This is accurate.ONLY in the election of mayors/mayoral committees.
The EFF won't let the DA push through anything they don't agree with in council going forward.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
This is accurate.ONLY in the election of mayors/mayoral committees.
The EFF won't let the DA push through anything they don't agree with in council going forward.
"We will not vote for a budget in Joburg that has bicycle lanes. I’ve never seen one person cycling in Sandton. And millions were spent on those lanes. We will not vote for a bicycle lane. Let's fight about bread and butter issues."
That I agree with. Sort out the necessities before looking at the nice to haves.
That I agree with. Sort out the necessities before looking at the nice to haves.
You do realise that those cycle lanes can be used by poor people as well.
Are they used? Nope.
Part of the reason: it's fkn deadly. Taxis must be reined in first. Establish law and order on the roads, and suddenly cycling becomes more attractive.
A lot of Joburg initiatives were put in by Parks Tau because he wanted to look good in eco conferences and stuff. However, the city is NOT ready for them. There are far more important things to get right first.
Why do water leaks go for days unattended?
Why does it take 2 months to get a pothole repaired? By the time they get round to it it costs multiples of what it would cost if it had been attended to immediately.
Why do suburbs go for 3 days without electricity? Why do informal settlements not have proper electrification?
Cycle lanes, wifi and that stupid eco-mobility month were just Parks giving the residents a pearl necklace.
You can add another question to the list:
Why do robots go out every time it rains? Such a ridiculous problem to have.
LOL. Hilarious. A non-coalition coalition. Agreeing to vote with the DA despite their differences is the dictionary definition of "coalition". Unless you don't want to pee off your radical followers, in which case you can just say that it's not a coalition (even though it really is) and hope that they don't know the difference.
Are they used? Nope.
Part of the reason: it's fkn deadly. Taxis must be reined in first. Establish law and order on the roads, and suddenly cycling becomes more attractive.
A lot of Joburg initiatives were put in by Parks Tau because he wanted to look good in eco conferences and stuff. However, the city is NOT ready for them. There are far more important things to get right first.
Why do water leaks go for days unattended?
Why does it take 2 months to get a pothole repaired? By the time they get round to it it costs multiples of what it would cost if it had been attended to immediately.
Why do suburbs go for 3 days without electricity? Why do informal settlements not have proper electrification?
Cycle lanes, wifi and that stupid eco-mobility month were just Parks giving the residents a pearl necklace.
It's not a coalition. It's just an agreement to install a DA exec mayor, without any agreement to vote either way on council matters going forward.
In a political setting, it is not a coalition. It's a minority government.The simplest dictionary definition of coalition is literally this - "a temporary alliance for combined action". The fact that it may only be restricted to the mayoral vote doesn't change the fact that, if only in that action, it's a coalition. It's obviously in the interest of both parties to make it look like something else, but no amount of word play will change the fact.
The simplest dictionary definition of coalition is literally this - "a temporary alliance for combined action". The fact that it may only be restricted to the mayoral vote doesn't change the fact that, if only in that action, it's a coalition. It's obviously in the interest of both parties to make it look like something else, but no amount of word play will change the fact.
Disagree. I think this helps keep the EFF ideologically pure and puts less pressure on some EFF figurehead having to govern well (as it would be their first executive).a massive own goal in my opinion.
Disagree. I think this helps keep the EFF ideologically pure and puts less pressure on some EFF figurehead having to govern well (as it would be their first executive).