2004
1953
51 years of hardship shaped the future of people claiming a country for 700 years.
Education prior too this? Say in 1911?
Say 1860?
Its common knowledge blacks who could afford education got it. Look at Mandela and Fort Hare
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
2004
1953
51 years of hardship shaped the future of people claiming a country for 700 years.
Education prior too this? Say in 1911?
Say 1860?
Those who wanted to,did. Certainly at the time you would have found their numbers a lot less because of the transition. To my memory, interracial schooling started in '91, or in more concrete terms when I was in Std 4 in my personal memory. From that time on there were multi-racial pupils in the exact same Model B\Model C school at the time. By the time we atained Matric together, they went on to achieve their lives just as much as I did, entering tertiary education etc. I won't disagree that they were heavily disadvantaged but I cannot compare the class of then to a Grade 10 class of this year.
Think of it this way, because of your bad background, poverty, malnutrition (helps a lot in brain development btw), the chances that your dad deserted you (high amongst blacks), lack of English as a first language, you are going to have a shaky start even smack first in Grade 1. You cannot honestly believe now that those in Gr10 of '96 who as you said, were heavily disadvantaged already, are successful now and passing their success to their kids (if they even have kids, its only been 14 years since '96). Why do you accept that 2 generations of uneducated backwardness can harm people but assume that 17 years, not even a generation, is going to be and should be better off?
In 1982 there were more black people in schools than whites.
Less money was spent on them. But it's just an interesting stat.
Because I work with them every day. People who are my age, of different race groups, who are competent in their fields involving mathematics and science. The fact is that those people were heavily disadvantaged, more than any modern generation because of the transition and still those who worked hard, succeeded. Also note that their children will only have started entering the schooling system in the last few years, hell I'm not even a father yet and the oldest child amongst the people my age that I know of is probably round six or seven.
We ALL know that Verwoerd didn't create maths or science so stop bringing that on to the table. He is clearly going on about the legacy of Bantu education: Verwoerd wanted to make achieving difficult for blacks by putting them in a social class of low skilled workers.
Again, your assumption now is that all black children from bad backgrounds can achieve a good life. In theory yes, in practise no. Those colleges of yours are a lucky few. You seem to have a very idealistic view of the world, unfortunately, its not that prefect, if it was, there wouldn't be any problems in the world now would it?
I won't argue with that because maybe it is a perception but my basic argument is that they, over 13 years ago could achieve it, then why can the children of today not. And that answer can only be because they they have been failed by the people who were supposed to help uplift them.
No Kosmik, it was implemented less than 60 years ago, and was abolished much, much later, there is a difference, so there is no ample time that you speak of.. The most important point being 2 generations of uneducated masses cannot provide as adequately to their children in the way educated parents can. You are under the assumption now that people in Grade 10 who had terrible education for the past 10 years is now all of a sudden given the same advantage as a person who had 10 years of good education? If not, then no, those matriculants from 96, 97 are still badly off.
I'm losing my patients now, I have already said the current education is bad and that it is the governments fault. But instead of pointless bashing, I try to find the root of the problem, that being there was bad education for decades in the first place that has led to us having leaders with no proper educational background.
Wait, am I confused here, are you saying a black person in Grade 10 in 1996 is just as well of as going to a normal school his whole life?
I'm already well aware of Mbeki's education, his one of the few with good ones ATTAINED OVERSEAS. I could do the same and link Zuma's education attainment![]()
Think of it this way, because of your bad background, poverty, malnutrition (helps a lot in brain development btw), the chances that your dad deserted you (high amongst blacks), lack of English as a first language, you are going to have a shaky start even smack first in Grade 1. You cannot honestly believe now that those in Gr10 of '96 who as you said, were heavily disadvantaged already, are successful now and passing their success to their kids (if they even have kids, its only been 14 years since '96). Why do you accept that 2 generations of uneducated backwardness can harm people but assume that 17 years, not even a generation, is going to be and should be better off?
Megas, I can only assume you are trying to talk to me. I've already told you you are on my blocked list
When did Verwoed die? 1966
Now if the Minister knew any maths whatsoever, he would see that 45 years have gone by, so blaming that guy is just illogical. Which brings me to my next point. Africans don't do logic well, and logic is fundamental for Maths.
Lets do one better, get us Malemas attainment! We know all about the woodwork.![]()
During what time period were you educated & what version of education did you recieve?
*note - marked are a few typo's noticed at a glance. I did not even look at grammer.