True. I found it interesting nonetheless.
Yep, definitely interesting. Hope they do one when the season is over.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
True. I found it interesting nonetheless.
Bale wins PFA Player of the Year.
Bloody joke. Should've been Suarez or RvP.
you mal? Suarez lost his chance after taking a bite outta Ivano
you mal? Suarez lost his chance after taking a bite outta Ivano
Guests at one of football’s biggest galas were stunned last night when black comedian Reginald D Hunter repeatedly said “n*****”.
Hunter, 44, warned PFA Player of the Year Dinner attendees including FA boss David Bernstein he would be using the word “liberally” during his 10-minute turn.
The Have I Got News For You regular opened with a joke about Liverpool FC’s Luis Suarez, who was banned for racially abusing Man United’s Patrice Evra last season.
The use of discriminatory language is unacceptable regardless of context
Oh look another gem:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/pfa-awards-dinner-comedian-reginald-1859058
Now if you will recall what David Bernstein said about the whole Suarez incident:
It's just a complete farce.
What's a complete farce? The dude is black, he's American, and he's a comedian.
Are you suggesting that the FA ban him? Or that they shouldn't have banned Suarez?
The dangers of spending above your means in the Premier League.
5 years after winning the FA Cup, Portsmouth will now be plying their trade in the lowest division of the Football League following their relegation to League Two. In that time they have entered administration twice and only managed to survive the 2012/13 season thanks to their supporter's trust. They no longer own the stadium they play in, the training ground they practice on or the academy their youth players train at.
QPR best hope Tony Fernandes is willing to hang about as they put themselves in a horrible financial position and the likes of Southampton, Portsmouth and Leeds United are proof of what can happen when you spend above your means.
Wolves are another ex-Premier League club staring down a dark road. They are all but confined to League One for the 2013/14 season, sitting 23rd and 3 points adrift of safety with one game to go. Currently they have a squad loaded with players with Premiership experience and that includes Premiership wages. If they are relegated they will become the 12th club to suffer two successive demotions and the financial implications of such a sequence of events are unsettling.
The voting was closed way before that happened.
Suarez and RvP were the best all season, most goals (Suarez was leading golden goal for quite awhile) and Bale just turned up after Christmas for a few good games.
You would think that some of these clubs would have learnt by now...
Spend, yes, but don't be ridiculous about it...
What's a complete farce? The dude is black, he's American, and he's a comedian.
Are you suggesting that the FA ban him? Or that they shouldn't have banned Suarez?
/snip
and the the likes of Stoke City and West Brown have kept their Premiership status secure without having to break the bank. But then again, if either of those three ever wanted to push on to greater heights then they'd have to spend. And big.
Do you know which of the current EPL sides has spent the least amount of money since 2006?
Do you know which of the current EPL sides has spent the least amount of money since 2006?
Well, I read an article about Aston Villa's fall from grace and simply put; you can thank the Champions League and the lure of Premiership TV money for the way clubs spend. Randy Lerner - Villa's owner - allowed Martin O'Neill to spend 120 million pounds in 4 years in pursuit of Champions League football, with a net loss of 82 million pounds on transfers. Fortunately for Villa, Lerner realised that their inability to reach the gold-lined pitches of the Champions League would spell financial disaster and he swiftly began to institute austerity measures, hence the youthful Villa team we have seen take a fair few beatings this season. The same could not be said of Leeds United and Portsmouth who continued to spend even when it was clear they could no longer support it.
At the other end of the table, and even before the new TV deal comes into effect, Premiership status is worth as much as 45 million pounds in TV revenue alone for the average team. The Championship play-off final has long been touted as the single most lucrative game in club football thanks to the winner receiving 30 million plus while the loser will continue to receive the roughly 1 million pounds in TV revenue that the average Championship side is awarded .
Essentially these clubs are spending money to make money and when it fails the results are spectacular. Granted some have managed it while being smart; David Moyes, while having failed to win a trophy or secure European football, has kept Everton competitive on a shoe-string and the the likes of Stoke City and West Brown have kept their Premiership status secure without having to break the bank. But then again, if either of those three ever wanted to push on to greater heights then they'd have to spend. And big.
You mean West Brom, not West Brown.
Also, Stoke City's net spend over the last five years is around 80m, only City and Chelsea are higher.