LancelotSA
Banned
You reading comprehension ... it sucks.
Staying committed is a not a constest
If we are going to exchange insults again, then my reading comprehension is far superior to your writing ability!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
You reading comprehension ... it sucks.
Staying committed is a not a constest
But wanting an open relationship is not a flaw or weakness. It is merely different to what you believe, blu.
That's my main objection to the anti-open relationship crowd in this thread. They seem unable to grasp the fsct that an open relationship is a perfectly healthy state for a lot of people if they are honedt with themselves. There is nothing immoral, dirty, weak or wrong with it if both partners are honest with each other.
What does that relationship entail ?
No-one has yet answered me satisfactorily as to , if you want multiple partners, why you bother going around telling people you are in a RELATIONSHIP ? What does that relationship entail ?
For once LancelotSA, I agree with you. Now I feel dirty and ashamed. Can we make a deal never to let this happen again?
Blu, I've answered that question twice. You just didn't like the answer.
You seem to think that laundry, a room mate and exclusive sex are the only components of a relationship which is pretty sad.
....but you cannot blame them, their ability to think freely has been diminished by society pushing values on them that they have accepted as being the norm. It is for this reason that they cannot accept polygamy, as practised by certain people, because it does not match their narrow criteria of what is acceptable. Anyone who does not do as they do is considered weak and flawed.
Sex.
No, I do not. It entails more. Please do not try and assume what I am thinking.
Blunomore.
Your incomprehension is merely a symptom of your ignorance.
Ignorance can be fixed.
I am in a relationship for 12 years of which it has been consenting aka open for the last 7 or 8 years of that.
The extramural activities that take place are purely sexual. There are no emotional connection to the other person.
The reasons why most of these do not work is the lack of communication. Communication is first and foremost the priority.
The other reason is the lack of rules.
There has to be rules to the...errr...engagements...always safe, always know what is expected, always know where it is taking place and always who it is taking place with.
We always have consent from each other before anything is arranged.
Then why say that those are the only benefits to an open relationship? Sleeping witg other people doesn't magically take away all the other benefits of an open relationship.
Gotta love Lance. He is now pretending to be oh-so-liberal and anyone who does not practice polygamy or open relationships, are old-fashioned and narrow-minded.
Surely it is my choice to accept the norms that I feel comfortable with and the ones I do not, I can reject ? You're claiming it for yourself, so you have to grant it to others. Or are you as narrow-minded as you accuse others of being ?
Ignorance about what ? Your weakness to commit to one person?
No-one has yet answered me satisfactorily as to , if you want multiple partners, why you bother going around telling people you are in a RELATIONSHIP ? What does that relationship entail ?
I would rather be in an honest "open" relationship rather than a dishonest, deceitful "closed" relationship any day of the week...
Most people claim they could never be in an open relationship because they love their partner too much, I tend to think it is driven more by jealousy and fear.
What - apart from sex with anyone you like - are the benefits ????
The views being expressed by you are old fashioned and narrow minded.
I am not condemning anyone in a monogamous relationship. Yes, I did express an opinion that usually those who cannot see themselves partaking in a more liberal lifestyle probably do so because of concerns about jealousy and insecurity, which I feel is perfectly valid. You on the other hand referred to those partaking in "open relationships" as being weak and flawed.