Oh, so it is not a big we-must-control-everything-the-people-see-and-do authoritarian mentality? (usualy hidden behind screens like religion, threat-of-terrorism, to-protect-the-children)
... Don't forget: 'South African Tsunami Protection Fund' AKA Government's shares in Telkom, Neotel and Sentech.
/Back on Topic/
It's very clear there are strong feelings on both sides of this issue. The problem, however, is not whether we need Big Brother to control what we have access to or not. The problem is the incompetence of those given the power / ability to actually restrict citizen's behaviour for their own benefit. I'm not defending either view, but just hear me out.
The FPB's role has declined over recent years and it stands to reason they want to protect their jobs and since the rest of government seems to be on the take ... why not join in?
Right!
"Content analysts will be employed to sit every day on the Internet and trace people who are putting this pornographic material out there, and especially to identify websites containing child abuse material... Our main objective is to protect children from harmful content."
This is a very noble goal. Every country should do it's utmost to protect children. This will also create some jobs so it's a positive thing. South Africa cannot control what gets hosted internationally so we should do whatever we can on the local front ... within reason.
According to the law, the distribution of "adult material" that has not been classified and licensed by the Board is in contravention of Section 24 of the Film and Publications Act.
This has a strong connotation of protecting the FPB's interests and not so much for the public's good. Government looking for
more left-wing control?
"In view of a number of complaints from the public regarding the distribution and exhibition of materials containing depictions, descriptions or sequences of sexual conduct via the Internet, by mail order and through mobile cellular phones, the Board advises the SA Police Service to investigate and charge any person using [the] above-mentioned media for distribution of films, interactive computer games or publications, which have either not been classified by the Board or classified XX or X18,"
Now this is getting to the critical issue. Is the SAPS going to 'investigate' and 'charge' school kids that take photos / video clips on their cellphones and spread them via Bluetooth? Good luck to them if they even bother to try. News Articles of this very thing happening more frequently is what started a lot of the fuss around adult content in recent times. According to the article's definition, these kids are all 'distributors' so what can the law do to minors? Lock them up and fine the parents?
"The minute you distribute pornographic material, you are called a distributor," said Makoela.
As far as 'films, interactive computer games or publications' goes ... there's very little locally produced stuff of this nature that I'm aware of. A lot, I imagine, would as legal / illegal imports and is a problem for Customs and Excise not the FPB ... unless the FPB is planning on building the "Great Censorship Wall of South Africa" and screen content from the rest of the world like China does.
There are some unsavoury individuals out there that does pose a risk. In my view, though, better methods of protecting minors can be imployed without infringing on the rights of consenting adults. The FPB in conjunction with ICASA (assuming they don't botch it up) can make it a mandatory condition of providing services that all service providers (Internet / cellular / broadband) install Content Filtering software on the Provider side to block all adult content. Adults passing the AVS will then be given a special passkey which they will need to use to gain access to mature content should they so wish but would prevent minors from doing so (unless the parents are irresponsible and give the passkeys to their kids). As an added measure, the parents can install client-side Content Filtering such as CyberPatrol / Net Nanny / or even the freeware Naomi.
It doesn't solve the issue of using cellphones directly (ie. taking photos / videos and sharing via Bluetooth) but that isn't being addressed with the current plan either.
This compromise should satisfy most people while ensuring the safety of children, which should be the main priority (and not profiteering / job security). That said, I find the following mind-boggling:
"In so far as posting sexual pictures of oneself on the Internet is concerned, the question that must be asked is whether or not the pictures are being posted so as to be made available to any person who wishes to access such pictures.
"If that is the case, then that would amount to distribution and that would be illegal.
This is a blatant infringement on Freedom of Expression. Who is the FPB to decide it's illegal for people around the globe that want to share explicit images of themselves with like-minded individuals? Provided such content is provided via secure portals requiring Adult Verification, children should not be exposed and even those that posted incorrectly would be blocked if Content Filters are used. If this stance is taken seriously, the next step will be to make it illegal for Star Trek fans to dress up as aliens and post their images on the internet as well ... where does the line end?
To conclude, there are issues which should be addressed. Address them in the correct manner through consultation with the
informed public and not through unilateral dictatorship-style policies. The FPB should start thinking and become knowledgeable in how to do their job properly instead of causing trouble over hot-topics. First ICASA not being competent and now the FPB. Then the joke that's our Health Care attitude towards HIV/AIDS. Not to mention the crisis of Saftey and Security in SA. I shudder to think what's next.