poweralert stage 2.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's still more of a myth than fact. Remember we heard from experts that current tech can keep old powerhouse tech going properly.
So it's a matter of how well the maintenance has been done.. by now they must have surely realised it's worth at least doing it fairly well in the longer run.
Well, over 20GW is permanently offline. This number will just increase.
 
Sorry for being so pessimistic, but did they ever said something and followed up and actually did it?
I'm really worried too, but they've kept it going somehow. I think they at least know if they don't it's digging their own grave.
 
Well, over 20GW is permanently offline. This number will just increase.
There's that magic 2 GW(?) they recovered a couple of months ago, or however that is supposed to work - never did get much of an explanation.

Not that it seems to have helped much..
 
There's that magic 2 GW(?) they recovered a couple of months ago, or however that is supposed to work - never did get much of an explanation.

Not that it seems to have helped much..
Gen is down to 16.5GW from winter peak of 22GW.
 
Why not bring some of the 20GW that is offline for years and years first before taking working units offline?
Those working units won't be working for long if they're not taken offline for maintenance. The real question is: why aren't they fixing the permanently offline 20GW while they also do regular maintenance on the units that are currently working?
 
Those working units won't be working for long if they're not taken offline for maintenance. The real question is: why aren't they fixing the permanently offline 20GW while they also do regular maintenance on the units that are currently working?
That's what I meant. :thumbsup:
 
Those working units won't be working for long if they're not taken offline for maintenance. The real question is: why aren't they fixing the permanently offline 20GW while they also do regular maintenance on the units that are currently working?
Because cadres must eat.
 
The real question is: why aren't they fixing the permanently offline 20GW while they also do regular maintenance on the units that are currently working?
Main theory is their Leftist financiers don't want them too, pushing for Green "solutions". So they just do a bit to suit themselves.

And there's the failed-state-allows-socialism theory they may follow - sounds like science-fiction, but is it..
 
Main theory is their Leftist financiers don't want them too, pushing for Green "solutions". So they just do a bit to suit themselves.

And there's the failed-state-allows-socialism theory they may follow - sounds like science-fiction, but is it..
It`s just some cadres who are hungry. If a cadre wants to eat he must break something. That is how SA works. The cadres are gorging themselves with the status quo so why must they do more to really fix things?
 
It`s just some cadres who are hungry. If a cadre wants to eat he must break something. That is how SA works. The cadres are gorging themselves with the status quo so why must they do more to really fix things?
The worst of them are like that. There's a few still keeping things going though, else we couldn't have lasted this long.
 
Those working units won't be working for long if they're not taken offline for maintenance. The real question is: why aren't they fixing the permanently offline 20GW while they also do regular maintenance on the units that are currently working?
They hired someone to do that, he was tasked with bringing online 4000 of that 20000MW but that failed spectacularly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X