Biscuit1018
Expert Member
Point is they were upfront about it and said if it doesnt suit you then ok, rather try somewhere else. Ya, theres the issue of calling it uncapped but thats an issue for the ASA. If 60gigs isnt enough then fair enough, move along.
I am glad though that there is someone like mweb who seem to be keeping up their end of the bargain so there is at least a choice of somewhere else to move to
Well I am not commenting on their contractural ethics because there is no issue there. It is upfront.
Nor am I interested in the ASA debate.
I realise I have the right to move on.
My point is simple
a) It isn't really uncapped if they choke so quickly. Forget the ASA just apply the reasonable man test. I am not going to sue anyone or write to the ASA. I will vote with my feet.
b) MWebs looks better on the face of it. If I am wrong here I would love someone to tell me. Maybe MWeb have a similar choking method.
Remember this is an article about comparing the various uncapped offering so my comment is in the appropriate place.
I realise that many posters love AH but that does not mean they are above criticism. My comment is fair comment with substantiation. WA got taken to the cleaners by many posters a few months back. My comments are polite in comparison to those and I didn't see many people coming to their defence. The ability to 'move on' applied there as well.
My criticism is fair comment and posted on the right thread.