Vie
Well-Known Member
Remember there was that MXIT case a little while ago, where mixit.co.za was forced to change their name. mixit.co.za had registered before mxit, but were still found to be in error. I reckon this will go the same way.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
UniForum SA don't adjudicate CO.ZA domain name disputes. Those are governed by the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) regulations, and handled by one of two accredited ADR providers (Arbitration Foundation of SA and SAIIPL).Well it's not internic, but Uniforum.
I managed to sign up for fun. I even clicked on a banner ad which took me to "Error 404 Page Not Found". LOL! Let's see how much rubbish I get as a 17-tear old techy-teen!
UniForum SA don't adjudicate CO.ZA domain name disputes. Those are governed by the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) regulations, and handled by one of two accredited ADR providers (Arbitration Foundation of SA and SAIIPL).
The regulations include the following as a factor indicating an abusive registration: "circumstances indicating that the registrant is using, or has registered, the domain name in a way that leads people or businesses to believe that the domain name is registered to, operated or authorised by, or otherwise connected with the complainant".
Vie mentioned the MXIT case, and that's definitely relevant. If gmail.co.za had been providing webmail services before Gmail launched, then they would have a solid defense. But launching a Gmail-like service using the gmail.co.za domain after Google took Gmail live is very likely to be viewed as abusive use of the domain, even if the domain itself was registered long before Gmail launched.
UniForum SA don't adjudicate CO.ZA domain name disputes. Those are governed by the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) regulations, and handled by one of two accredited ADR providers (Arbitration Foundation of SA and SAIIPL).
The regulations include the following as a factor indicating an abusive registration: "circumstances indicating that the registrant is using, or has registered, the domain name in a way that leads people or businesses to believe that the domain name is registered to, operated or authorised by, or otherwise connected with the complainant".
Vie mentioned the MXIT case, and that's definitely relevant. If gmail.co.za had been providing webmail services before Gmail launched, then they would have a solid defense. But launching a Gmail-like service using the gmail.co.za domain after Google took Gmail live is very likely to be viewed as abusive use of the domain, even if the domain itself was registered long before Gmail launched.
But you ARE a 17-year old techy-teen.![]()
Well it's not internic, but Uniforum. Sadly co.za is not co-operating at giving me a whois for gmail.co.za, but if it was registered before Google's gmail came into existence ( I think it was from my prior attempt at co.za ) ie: 1 April 2004, it might be safe. Google does not have rights to the gmail domain in Germany or Switzerland, remember, based on prior use.
Can anyone else get a whois?
I work for Gardale myself (but in no way do my views represent theirs and should not be quoted as if they do bla bla bla other stuff to not get me fired goes here) and when I first heard about this quite some time ago I was told that the company actually had the domain since before Gmail itself was running.
True? Not True? I'll be damned if I know but if it is they're pretty damn safe legally speaking.
I work for Gardale myself (but in no way do my views represent theirs and should not be quoted as if they do bla bla bla other stuff to not get me fired goes here) and when I first heard about this quite some time ago I was told that the company actually had the domain since before Gmail itself was running.
True? Not True? I'll be damned if I know but if it is they're pretty damn safe legally speaking.