SA Politics Thread Part 10 : The GNU Has Crashed

Status
Not open for further replies.
What happens if a department cannot get its budget passed? Seems that all the other political parties are falling over themselves to get behind the DA

There's no mention of how the ANC MPs defended her. That's where the real comedy is...
Welp, at the very least it seems there's bipartisan (not sure what else to say, tripartisan, quadruplepartisan...?) agreement that Nkabane must **** off. And of course, true to form, according to Netwerk24...

Those who reject her budget reject transformation in South Africa’s higher education sector.

“When you are against transformation, it irritates you when you see a young woman leading such a big ministry. It irritates you even more when that woman is a black woman,” says Dr. Nobuhle Nkabane, Minister of Higher Education and Training.

“It is unfortunate that some of the honourable members have indicated that they will not support the budget. They are not rejecting Nobuhle Nkabane’s budget. This is not my budget. This is the budget of the people of South Africa.”
 
What happens if a department cannot get its budget passed? Seems that all the other political parties are falling over themselves to get behind the DA

I'm working off memory, but I read somewhere that they then have to use 45% of the previous year's budget for a limited number of months?
 
Welp, at the very least it seems there's bipartisan (not sure what else to say, tripartisan, quadruplepartisan...?) agreement that Nkabane must **** off. And of course, true to form, according to Netwerk24...
At least she's now made it clear that anyone who hides behind transformation is a lying, corrupt POS...
 
At least she's now made it clear that anyone who hides behind transformation is a lying, corrupt POS...
That's why the words "transformation" and "redress" have become so toxic.

I don't think there's much opposition amongst average South Africans against the principle. But they have been used so many times as a decoy for total corruption, greed, accountability regarding maladministration, and to justify plain and simple racial discrimination, that people tend to recoil or roll their eyes at these terms.
 
Another 48hrs?
Are you getting a bit nervous that Cyril's decision might be subject to judicial review? Reminds me of the time they extended covid lockdown regulations which were only banished once it was clear they'd lose in court in June 2022. The ANC does plenty of illegal stuff all the time.
 
Let the paid influencers deal in their snark and sarcasm. The DA will continue to govern. None of the paid snark peddlers have experienced total governance collapse so it's easy to sit on your high horse and tell the DA to collapse this, collapse that, leave this, leave that. Just like @TheChamp after the 2024 elections, they will all disappear into the void when the DA makes an election clean sweep due solely to them completely out-maneuvering the ANC in their ministerial portfolios.
Just like the vat and budget debacle.
Had a nice long quiet session while they licked their wounds and the bot money dried up.
They are only noisy now due to the message they are being paid to push
 
I welcome anything the DA does because I know they are going to end up embarrassing themselves, I was just asking if they will give the President a 48hr ultimatum before going to court?
You mean like voting for a vat increase. Using unconstitutional methods and leaving the country without a valid budget.
Massive debacle
 
He's well within his rights, but he doesn't have unfettered power. His decisions still need to pass the test of legality and rationality, which the courts will decide.

It's not some airy fairy stuff, it's an actual legal requirement for which there's precedent.

AI:
In South Africa, the President's exercise of power, including decision-making, must be rational and lawful. This principle, derived from the rule of law, requires a logical connection between the power exercised and the purpose for which it was granted. Courts can review presidential actions to ensure they meet this rationality standard.

Elaboration:
  • Principle of Legality:
    The South African Constitution, underpinned by the rule of law, mandates that the President's actions must be lawful and rational.

  • Rationality Requirement:
    This means that the President's decisions must be justifiable, based on valid reasoning, and the process leading to the decision must be transparent.

  • Judicial Review:
    Courts can review presidential actions to determine if they meet the rationality standard. This includes examining whether the means used by the President are reasonably connected to the intended outcome.

  • Examples:
    The Constitutional Court has addressed rationality in various cases, including the appointment of public officials and the exercise of the pardon power, emphasizing the need for a rational link between means and ends.

  • Consequences of Irrationality:
    If a court finds that a presidential decision lacks a rational connection to its purpose, it can be deemed unlawful and set aside.

  • Importance:
    The rationality requirement ensures that the President's power is not exercised arbitrarily but in accordance with the law and the Constitution.

A source:
 
He's well within his rights, but he doesn't have unfettered power. His decisions still need to pass the test of legality and rationality, which the courts will decide.

It's not some airy fairy stuff, it's an actual legal requirement for which there's precedent.

AI:


A source:
And this is why the paid bots like champy and Malcom are to be pitied
They do not understand the requirements they should be holding their public officials to.
Still stuck in the tribal days and prostrating themselves in front of their beloved dictators

DA must just take all their "rulings" to court to be measured
 
And this is why the paid bots like champy and Malcom are to be pitied
They do not understand the requirements they should be holding their public officials to.
Still stuck in the tribal days and prostrating themselves in front of their beloved dictators

DA must just take all their "rulings" to court to be measured
We welcome the DA taking all the rulings to court, just promise to give the man 48hrs before doing so, okay?
 
He's well within his rights, but he doesn't have unfettered power. His decisions still need to pass the test of legality and rationality, which the courts will decide.

It's not some airy fairy stuff, it's an actual legal requirement for which there's precedent.

AI:


A source:
The reason Cyril takes longer to make decisions is because all of his decisions are carefully considered, that's why Whitfield was also not fired on the spot but Cyril took time to apply his mind before firing him.

But of course, I do welcome the DA going to court to challenge his decision, they will be left with egg all over their face.
 
Just the one by-election today in the township of Motherwell in Nelson Mandela Bay (PE/Gqeberha). Another easy by-election for the ANC comrades.

ProvinceMunicipalityWard NumberPartyWard Vote Share (%)
Eastern CapeNelson Mandela Bay57ANC59.4
Independent18.5
EFF13.9
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X