Next Thing
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2005
- Messages
- 7,800
- Reaction score
- 10,416
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Are you deliberately ignoring the question and answering the one that wasn't asked?Yes and No. Employers cannot arbitarially recover the funds. There is also an element of the recipient notifying the employer of the problem and agreeing to a refund method
Staying silent is not an option
View attachment 1844121
Do you have a link to the article?
They never won a majority, so how were they in charge?It was simple question really. So, DA was the party in charge, correct ? Did I say it was DA conspiracy ?
The onus is not only on the employer . It is also on the recipient and not them hoping that someone doesnt noticeAre you deliberately ignoring the question and answering the one that wasn't asked?
I never said anything about the employer arbitrarily recovering funds, I said the employer must come back to him to make arrangements to recover the funds, how difficult is that to understand?
Do you recall the name of the councillor who mentioned it? I have some follow up question.Was mentioned in the statement by the councillor if I remember correctly
But how exactly is the issue of her being the deputy Mayor fits into the whole thing?They never won a majority, so how were they in charge?
Also let's gloss over the fact that she was the deputy mayor, to whom all MMC's reported to. A position that was created for her, which was criticised by the ANC as a wasteful position, which is no longer an issue while the ANC occupies it...
So Mchunu is suspended but has enough 'clout' to get the hawks to do his dirty work, which judge would grant such a warrant?
Let's go with that for a minute, after you have notified your employer you expect them to act in terms of recovering the money, right?
Thanks for answering, I knew it was a simple question, no idea why @Major Boredom was jumping all over the place like an artful dodger.Sure thing. And they failed twice again after that. I went back again and again, understood it to be a process. Eventually it was corrected.
Do you recall the name of the councillor who mentioned it? I have some follow up question.
Thanks for answering, I knew it was a simple question, no idea why @Major Boredom was jumping all over the place like an artful dodger.
Back to the issue, is there any indication that Nasiphi did not inform the employer of the overpayment or any indication that the employer wasn't aware?
There are indications the employer and employee were both aware as others had allready paid back the money , but she had notBack to the issue, is there any indication that Nasiphi did not inform the employer of the overpayment or any indication that the employer wasn't aware?
Its just his version of trying to deflectIs there any indication that she did inform the employer? You're asking for negative evidence. That's just a gaslight.
Yes indeed there is such an indication, besides that the employer has always been aware of the overpayment because it wasn't a payment made in error as it was in your case.Is there any indication that she did inform the employer? You're asking for negative evidence. That's just a gaslight.
Let me continue with @Bewlen since he is the one who wants to understand how the DA being in power at the time fits into the picture.There are indications the employer and employee were both aware as others had allready paid back the money , but she had not
Apparently there were 2 seperate instances including a second smaller one where she got an advance for a trip she did not do
City should have just started legal processes instead of being nice about it
Have fun Samuel LittleLet me continue with @Bewlen since he is the one who wants to understand how the DA being in power at the time fits into the picture.
Yes indeed there is such an indication, besides that the employer has always been aware of the overpayment because it wasn't a payment made in error as it was in your case.