SABNZBD, Sickbeard & Couchpotato Guide.

Could anyone help out. All of a sudden after a few weeks of using sabnzbd and sickbeard succesfully, sabnzbd is giving this error " Exit(1) Unable to open URL: [Errno socket error] [Errno 10061] No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it". I have not got a clue why this is happening all of a sudden I haven't made any changes to my network or program settings.
I suggest posting on the SAB forums, they would know more about particular error codes, no doubt they would be able to help.
 
I suggest posting on the SAB forums, they would know more about particular error codes, no doubt they would be able to help.

Will do it later, thanks bud :thumbup:

EDIT: problem sorted, had to reinstall and set up from scratch, still don't know what happened. Looks like the config file might have been corrupted.
 
Last edited:
Pretty unimpressed with SABNzbd so far - it gives me about a 20% success rate on things downloaded - either the download shows as incomplete and irrepairable when done, or the contents of the file are malware. I think I've set things up pretty well:
- using non-free usenet provider (nextgennews) as well as 2 free backup providers
- using non-free usenet indexer (newztown) as well as 2 free backup indexers

Seems like a pretty bizarre technology, that only knows after a large download, whether the files can be reconstructed or not. Am I missing something, is there a way to get it more consistent, or do I just have to download stuff and know that the majority of download bandwidth will be wasted, because the end result is unusable...
 
Pretty unimpressed with SABNzbd so far - it gives me about a 20% success rate on things downloaded - either the download shows as incomplete and irrepairable when done, or the contents of the file are malware. I think I've set things up pretty well:
- using non-free usenet provider (nextgennews) as well as 2 free backup providers
- using non-free usenet indexer (newztown) as well as 2 free backup indexers

Seems like a pretty bizarre technology, that only knows after a large download, whether the files can be reconstructed or not. Am I missing something, is there a way to get it more consistent, or do I just have to download stuff and know that the majority of download bandwidth will be wasted, because the end result is unusable...

20% is pretty damn low, I get closer to 98% success rate if I had to guesstimate. Are you trying to get really old stuff by any chance?

Also you will learn when to recognise an issue before you've downloaded it entirely, if you hover over the download it will tell you the amount of current missing blocks. Generally if you start seeing more than 5 missing blocks from the get-go then it's highly likely that download is a dud.

I've also never got malware or any other type of file except the one I was trying to download.
 
20% is pretty damn low, I get closer to 98% success rate if I had to guesstimate. Are you trying to get really old stuff by any chance?

Also you will learn when to recognise an issue before you've downloaded it entirely, if you hover over the download it will tell you the amount of current missing blocks. Generally if you start seeing more than 5 missing blocks from the get-go then it's highly likely that download is a dud.

I've also never got malware or any other type of file except the one I was trying to download.

Thanks - actually it's brand new stuff (movies) I'm trying to download - sometimes the video file won't play, and there's a "codec exe" that you're supposed to run, which is clearly malware. Sometimes it's password protected and you have to do some survey online to get the password. Most often, it just fails with missing blocks etc (thanks for the tip on this one)

What usenet provider, and indexer do you use? Do you use CouchPotato, or manually search for NZBs - if manually, how do you spot best download options? So far, I look for high numbers of grabs, and some comments...
 
Pretty unimpressed with SABNzbd so far - it gives me about a 20% success rate on things downloaded - either the download shows as incomplete and irrepairable when done, or the contents of the file are malware. I think I've set things up pretty well:
- using non-free usenet provider (nextgennews) as well as 2 free backup providers
- using non-free usenet indexer (newztown) as well as 2 free backup indexers

Seems like a pretty bizarre technology, that only knows after a large download, whether the files can be reconstructed or not. Am I missing something, is there a way to get it more consistent, or do I just have to download stuff and know that the majority of download bandwidth will be wasted, because the end result is unusable...
Just tell it to abort jobs that cannot be completed in switches. 20%? Are you only downloading HBO shows? Because those have a high failure rate.
 
Just tell it to abort jobs that cannot be completed in switches. 20%? Are you only downloading HBO shows? Because those have a high failure rate.

I couldn't see this setting in switches - can you explain more?
 
Thanks - actually it's brand new stuff (movies) I'm trying to download - sometimes the video file won't play, and there's a "codec exe" that you're supposed to run, which is clearly malware. Sometimes it's password protected and you have to do some survey online to get the password. Most often, it just fails with missing blocks etc (thanks for the tip on this one)

What usenet provider, and indexer do you use? Do you use CouchPotato, or manually search for NZBs - if manually, how do you spot best download options? So far, I look for high numbers of grabs, and some comments...

A tip for Couchpotato is if you get the wrong file in the nzb, then check if it has the groups name (i.e. the group that ripped it) and add that group name to the ignored words in the CP settings so you don't get anything from that group again.
 
Just tell it to abort jobs that cannot be completed in switches. 20%? Are you only downloading HBO shows? Because those have a high failure rate.

Is this now a confirmed thing ? Cause I'll add a +1 to confirm it, if its still a theory.
 
Is this now a confirmed thing ? Cause I'll add a +1 to confirm it, if its still a theory.
Well try download any HBO show that's a few weeks old, it will most likely fail. The big bang theory and some shows from The CW also suffer from fast DMCA takedowns.
 
For those who are too lazy to read instructions and would prefer watching a video:

[video=youtube;hHV6uM2pDmA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHV6uM2pDmA&list=PLCADC4FFB77909D71[/video]
 
20% is pretty damn low, I get closer to 98% success rate if I had to guesstimate. Are you trying to get really old stuff by any chance?

Also you will learn when to recognise an issue before you've downloaded it entirely, if you hover over the download it will tell you the amount of current missing blocks. Generally if you start seeing more than 5 missing blocks from the get-go then it's highly likely that download is a dud.

I've also never got malware or any other type of file except the one I was trying to download.

Are missing blocks the same as missing articles?
 
DrJohnZoidberg - do you use couchpotato, or just do manual nzb searches?
 
Not on mine, detect duplicate downloads is third,are you running an old version or something?

I must be - how do I update? I see an option "Check for updates once a week" but is there a way to force an update check?
 
Upgrade to SABNzbd 0.7.17 seems to have improved things - options to check through the download before starting, and to stop on a predicted fail, make things more promising, first few downloads much better so far...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X