Sanral offices evacuated, e-tolls down

What violence?

* Gantry-smashing (already happened) or worse.
* Sending deadly substances into work-places is not violence to you?

"Violence is "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation"

The alleged dangerous molecules are physical, and project power if used, no?
 
* Gantry-smashing (already happened) or worse.
* Sending deadly substances into work-places is not violence to you?

"Violence is "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation"

The alleged dangerous molecules are physical, and project power if used, no?

What have we here, another bleeding heart? /facepalm

They don't even know what was in the envelope. I can almost guarantee you that this was non-lethal and not dangerous. But let's wait and see.

EDIT: as for the 'and worse' after gantry smashing...what might that be? Swearing at a Sanral employee?
 
* Gantry-smashing (already happened) or worse.
* Sending deadly substances into work-places is not violence to you?

"Violence is "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation"

The alleged dangerous molecules are physical, and project power if used, no?
Seems like Vusi Moaner has more than one account here. Can you confirm that it was in fact a deadly substance, and not part of somebody's coke stash?
 
They don't even know what was in the envelope. I can almost guarantee you that this was non-lethal and not dangerous. But let's wait and see.

It matters not. They are "under attack". They will put up defenses, and increase controls. Natural reaction. We lose.

... as for the 'and worse' after gantry smashing...what might that be? Swearing at a Sanral employee?

You want a list? Ha. Not on this phone line...
 
Can you confirm that it was in fact a deadly substance, and not part of somebody's coke stash?

Of course I can't. I'm nobody. But as I mentioned to slootvreter above, it doesn't matter.

Disclaimer, for the record: I think the e-tolling, as implemented in context, is evil, and e-tags the most evil aspect of all.
 
What have we here, another bleeding heart? /facepalm

They don't even know what was in the envelope. I can almost guarantee you that this was non-lethal and not dangerous. But let's wait and see.

EDIT: as for the 'and worse' after gantry smashing...what might that be? Swearing at a Sanral employee?

It's actually terrorism... sending a hoax white powder to simulate a biological attack is not a joke.

If you cannot maintain moral superiority in your protest, then what does it degrade to?
Where will encouraging this kind of behaviour end up? Smashing people's windshields who have eTags? Stoning registered vehicles? Arson? Murder?

fkn retarded if you ask me.
 
It's actually terrorism... sending a hoax white powder to simulate a biological attack is not a joke.

If you cannot maintain moral superiority in your protest, then what does it degrade to?
Where will encouraging this kind of behaviour end up? Smashing people's windshields who have eTags? Stoning registered vehicles? Arson? Murder?

fkn retarded if you ask me.
There was nothing moral in the way they implemented e-trolls. You reap what you sow...
 
* Gantry-smashing (already happened) or worse.
* Sending deadly substances into work-places is not violence to you?

"Violence is "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation"

The alleged dangerous molecules are physical, and project power if used, no?

Haven't read anything about gantry smashing, please provide source? (hope you don't mean the "cameras stolen of gantry" pic, those gantries are not active yet since construction of those section of road has not finished)

How do you know it was a deadly powder and not just maizemeal?
 
There was nothing moral in the way they implemented e-trolls. You reap what you sow...

Who cares?
If you condone sending "mysterious white powders" to everyone you disagree with... you become more than a forum troll...
You become a TERRORIST.

How do you know it was a deadly powder and not just maizemeal?
Tell that to the judge when he sends you to jail as a joke?
 
There was nothing moral in the way they implemented e-trolls. You reap what you sow...

That may be true, but terrorism is not the way to resolve this. It only weakens the standpoint of those who object rationally...
 
How do you know it was a deadly powder and not just maizemeal?

Honestly don't think the actual powder matters, it the person gets traced they could probably get charges under a public disorder offence or assault not to mention that SANRAL may be able to launch a civil case against them for disrupting serivices). Bit stupid to turn a perfectly effective social protest into a violent one, giving the opposition some moral superiority.

Out of interest how difficult is it to produce\buy anthrax in S.A? Thinking some of the varsity/private labs might be able to do it; but given the small potential sources, jumping to that conclusion was a bit stupid of SANRAL, most likely baby powder and an overreaction.
 
It could just as well have been an employee wanting to leave work early. Some people can get really creative for some time off.
 
Who cares?
If you condone sending "mysterious white powders" to everyone you disagree with... you become more than a forum troll...
You become a TERRORIST.


Tell that to the judge when he sends you to jail as a joke?
Dictionary definition of terrorism...

ter·ror·ism
noun \ˈter-ər-ˌi-zəm\

: the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X