:crylaugh::crylaugh:
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
All very well and good trying to rid the university of Euro-centrism (before you all jump on me for this I'd wager most of you know a damn-sight more about Europe/great Europeans than you do about the Middle-East, Asia and South America).
But with science you'd ultimately converge on the same thing given enough time. I sure as hell am not going to toss out 600 years of scientific knowledge and start over from basic experiments and philosophy just to come to the same answers. The best thing to do with science is take it and run with it, contribute and eventually leave your own mark on scientific history.
I thought that she was being sarcastic, and I laughed. I realised that she was serious and I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. So I laughed and afterwards wiped the tears from m eyes.
I thought for a while she was trying to make an argument AGAINST decolonization. I do think she talked herself in to a hole though and then latched on to the idea that science can't explain everything and tried to make that the basis for her logic.
All very well and good trying to rid the university of Euro-centrism (before you all jump on me for this I'd wager most of you know a damn-sight more about Europe/great Europeans than you do about the Middle-East, Asia and South America).
But with science you'd ultimately converge on the same thing given enough time. I sure as hell am not going to toss out 600 years of scientific knowledge and start over from basic experiments and philosophy just to come to the same answers. The best thing to do with science is take it and run with it, contribute and eventually leave your own mark on scientific history.
One of the other threads (although most of them really) shows that people on here (and many elsewhere) really do seem to think 'here be dragons' was applicable everywhere before Europe's advancements.
Anyway, from what I understand the idea isn't that you'd do actual science differently. I mean, why would it? It's about the history of the fields, sources of knowledge, promoting STEM to non-traditional demographics etc.
Numpties like those in the video are going full retard, though.
One of the other threads (although most of them really) shows that people on here (and many elsewhere) really do seem to think 'here be dragons' was applicable everywhere before Europe's advancements.
Anyway, from what I understand the idea isn't that you'd do actual science differently. I mean, why would it? It's about the history of the fields, sources of knowledge, promoting STEM to non-traditional demographics etc.
Numpties like those in the video are going full retard, though.
All very well and good trying to rid the university of Euro-centrism (before you all jump on me for this I'd wager most of you know a damn-sight more about Europe/great Europeans than you do about the Middle-East, Asia and South America).
But with science you'd ultimately converge on the same thing given enough time. I sure as hell am not going to toss out 600 years of scientific knowledge and start over from basic experiments and philosophy just to come to the same answers. The best thing to do with science is take it and run with it, contribute and eventually leave your own mark on scientific history.
You joke but Newton himself was an alchemist.
Contemporary Western science pretty much really kicked off around the same time.
See the Age of Enlightenment
You do the ancient Greeks a disservice...
Aristotle, Archimedes, Thales, Eupalinus, Hero, Eratosthenes...
SJW's in disguise.