Love Gottrends conclusion.
I don't get where peeps get off dissing Seacom in this thread. The only input was from 2 owners of businesses that stand to make losses from true competition.
This article gave them an oppurtunity to twist facts to their liking, in the hope of providing the public with a "plausible reason" for their continued raping of the consumer.
Those were not facts, but simply them having said something to the press, which is meant to make us understand their plight.
There can be no reason why offerings should not be lower because Seacom. The infrastructure has been in place for years and costs have been recovered. All that needs to be done is "Plug & Play".
Rouxenator, Seacom have certainly considered ROI. But not for the reasoning you are trying to make mention of. Their business model is to simply supply bandwidth, cheaply and create volumes which then facilitates their ROI. Also consider that we are not the only stop along Seacom's path.
The entire East Coast of Africa is generating revenue for them.
So your doomsday prophecy is misdirected. The cable is not the problem. Local players in the market like IS are.
I still feel that, ISP's, Cellular operators, ICENS holders and Dark Fibre are sources of hope.
If they come together and find a workaround Telkom's interconnect fees. We could see change.
So everyone should look at the bigger picture that's been hanging on our walls for all of these years. The problem is not with Seacom, but with people like our two industry experts quoted in this article.
Apologies for any spelling errors. Posted from phone.