Sunette Bridges facebook hate speech case

no, go back and read again. we were specifically talking about the inequality of income based on race. you gave me a tool that measures income, but which exclusively states that it excludes race.

and we are going in circles
 
Agree with MickeyD, guys, go start another thread please ;)
 
yes, i only heard of it yesterday, and i have read up on it, do you want me to quote my sources? all you have given me is the government website with no specific references that they are using that method in a modified way. don't get all uppity now.

I did not just give you a government website. This is why I have stopped bothering because you seem to be ignoring so many things I say.
 
but to entertain you I will say this

even though you just found out about the gini coefficient yesterday, it actually has been around for decades and it is a well known statistic, if you think people who make policy (especially in National Treasury) are not aware of the gini-coefficient (whether modified or not) and not using it in their decision making process, then you are extremely naive.
 
Well that may be true, I don't personally agree with you on that but people have different ideas about what the government is responsible for. I think though that creating a safe and comfortable place to live for you and your children is not their job, it's too important to hand over all responsibility for our future to a government, especially one we know is corrupt at the top. Either we do what we can as business and individuals to help government make this country work or we explain to our children that sorry, but it wasn't my job...

FYI - It is not their job, it is their duty.

The first duty of government is to protect the citizens of the country.
That protection includes a safe, secure, economically stable environment, in which all citizens irrespective of race , creed or colour have an equal opportunity to employment, education, safety and security so they may prosper and live.
 
FYI - It is not their job, it is their duty.

The first duty of government is to protect the citizens of the country.
That protection includes a safe, secure, economically stable environment, in which all citizens irrespective of race , creed or colour have an equal opportunity to employment, education, safety and security so they may prosper and live.
Great, I'll let you explain to your kids why you didn't bother creating a safer future for them cause you decided to leave it up to a corrupt government and so, sorry kids, it was their duty, they failed, we knew they would, you're in the **** and I did **** all to make a difference or change that.
 
Wow, looking at twitter comments, Im pretty disgusted at some Afrikaans people are responding. :sick: Mindless internet mob forming.

And then they wonder why the international community doesnt respond when they shout "genoicode". Probably thinking, "useless ANC still haven't dealt with those retards"
 
The Equality Court sitting in the Western Cape High Court will on Tuesday hear a hate speech case against Afrikaans songstress Sunette Bridges.

The SA Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has accused Bridges of hosting commentary on her Facebook page which constitutes hate speech.

The 43-year-old describes herself on her website as a mother of five, Afrikaner, artist, writer, and a "concerned citizen of the once prosperous country called South Africa".

The commission received complaints from the public about the alleged hate speech on the singer's Facebook page for a number of years. Spokesman Isaac Mangena said the court papers contained numerous examples of the "violent hate speech and racist" comments.

The SAHRC had approached Bridges, and she denied committing any offence. The commission would argue that Bridges had violated of sections 10(1) and 11 of the Equality Act.


Source : Sapa /gq/th
Date : 20 Jan 2015 02:02
 
Should the PRESIDENT not set example and apologize for singing songs about killing whites first ?

===

SAHRC WANTS SUNETTE BRIDGES TO APOLOGISE

The SAHRC has accused Bridges of hosting commentary on her Facebook page that constitutes hate speech.

Shamiela Fisher | about 12 hours ago

CAPE TOWN - The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) says it is willing to settle a hate speech case against Afrikaans singer Sunette Bridges out of court.

The matter was heard in the Equality Court sitting in the Western Cape High Court yesterday.

The commission has accused Bridges of hosting commentary on her Facebook page that constitutes hate speech.

The commission says it wants Bridges to apologise and remove the comments.

The commission’s Bridgit Rubinstein says, “It is actually an established principle in our law that the publisher or the host of a Facebook page can be held liable for comments that are posted on a page if they aren’t contradicted or removed.”

But Bridges' lawyer Paul Kruger says his client has denied being guilty of hate speech.

“What the applicant in fact wants the Human Rights Commission, in our view, is impossible to do. I’m very glad that in fact the judge made the ruling that we have to have evidence in that regard.”

http://ewn.co.za/2015/01/21/SAHRC-wants-Sunette-Bridges-to-apologise
 
Personally,I don;t think celebs should take political stance on any issue. Amateur politicians,not that the pro's get any more respect from me. I hate politics.
 
Should the PRESIDENT not set example and apologize for singing songs about killing whites first ?

===

SAHRC WANTS SUNETTE BRIDGES TO APOLOGISE

The SAHRC has accused Bridges of hosting commentary on her Facebook page that constitutes hate speech.

Shamiela Fisher | about 12 hours ago

CAPE TOWN - The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) says it is willing to settle a hate speech case against Afrikaans singer Sunette Bridges out of court.

The matter was heard in the Equality Court sitting in the Western Cape High Court yesterday.

The commission has accused Bridges of hosting commentary on her Facebook page that constitutes hate speech.

The commission says it wants Bridges to apologise and remove the comments.

The commission’s Bridgit Rubinstein says, “It is actually an established principle in our law that the publisher or the host of a Facebook page can be held liable for comments that are posted on a page if they aren’t contradicted or removed.”

But Bridges' lawyer Paul Kruger says his client has denied being guilty of hate speech.

“What the applicant in fact wants the Human Rights Commission, in our view, is impossible to do. I’m very glad that in fact the judge made the ruling that we have to have evidence in that regard.”

http://ewn.co.za/2015/01/21/SAHRC-wants-Sunette-Bridges-to-apologise

Why don't you ask the Gelofte Volk about that one.
 
Personally,I don;t think celebs should take political stance on any issue. Amateur politicians,not that the pro's get any more respect from me. I hate politics.

If you want democracy, you gotta have politics.
 
And then they wonder why the international community doesnt respond when they shout "genoicode". Probably thinking, "useless ANC still haven't dealt with those retards"

Could you elaborate what you mean by "dealt with"?
 
Yes, it's a good idea to ruin someone's life because they did not re-arrange some bytes on a page somewhere. Well done!

The rights of pixels, vs rights of real people. But I guess all of this is lost.
 
Yes, it's a good idea to ruin someone's life because they did not re-arrange some bytes on a page somewhere. Well done!

The rights of pixels, vs rights of real people. But I guess all of this is lost.

not as rudimentary as you trying to make it...when one spew one's ignorance and becomes a coalescing point for like minded.....one must take ownership for one's view and posse...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X