Grouter
Executive Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 5,666
thanks for the info ranger. Its a bit disappointing to now have this restriction, but will try and follow your advice, although its difficult to watch netflix during those times![]()
... and the bar is orange
Maybe ranger can comment on the significance when he has a chance.
IM dyslexic MOST people dont understand me
Cheers di♥
PS I an not going to read wat I wrote cos If i start correcting stuf we might be in the next melenium
@ranger
Issue is : throttling is not working ( Hear me out) ie line speed gets reduced however the quality drops and what I mean by this is that websites simply dont load. eg I want to load a banks website or gmail and it will never load or I have to pick reload. NB this is on a 4 meg line that has been throttled. Line stops working every few minutes even though router says connected. A game like dota 2 becomes laggy.
Downloading and update for PS4 takes 2 days (175 mb) and this is not from the slow speed, this is because the download keeps timing out.
No need to shout. :wtf:
Firstly - This tells me that if my usage @ 29%* of my total possible usage is having a detrimental effect on Telkom’s Network, what exactly is this network made of? - Two tin cans and some string?
Secondly – Telkom, seems to be throttling the connections really badly, to the extent that the connection is possibly unusable (according to a post above)
If you are basing your complaints about throttling purely on MightyMuffinMan's description, and not your own experience, please note that we are investigating some issues which are unrelated to throttling which may be impacting MightyMuffinMan as well as Electric who was not throttled. (we have some capped users who reported a similar experience while they were in quota). Unfortunately we have some high priority work to be completed during this week (which should hopefully further improve experience), so I haven't had time to keep up-to-date with the investigation of that issue.
There is nothing different in implementation from the in the throttling from what people were paying R199/month for 2 years ago ...
Thanks ranger. I hope you guys sort out the throttling issues.
Really like I said its not an issue of being throttled ie slowing down our line speeds. The issue I (And I'm sure many are experiencing) is that the connection does a timeout for basic tasks (Gmail; banking ; updating android apps off play etc) even if the connection it self is fine. I don't know if that makes sense.
The help desk and fault reporting refuse to acknowledge that that is the complaint and even imply that its the new throttling policy (refusing to investigate why webpages are timing out) and hopefully thats not the case as than its a slap in the face of many loyal customers who supported the network and never changed ISP's through thick or thin.
I personally have roughly 6 devices connected and its only an issue with the new throttling policy as connecting with another adsl account the line works fine.
Bottomline: the account becomes useless if I will not be able to do what i need to do eg do a payment via internet banking or check a BMJ medical review article. Uncapped supposed to offer a service where one plugs it in and it works (regardless of FUP)
Ok so I thought I will raise an issue here, the throttling seems quite bad once we reach the “power user” status, this worries me.
Let’s keep in the back of our minds that this is an uncapped 4mbps account. I have used just over 299.354 GB(1). My calculations tell me that if download 24/7 on my uncapped account I should achieve a total usage of just over 1.02 TB (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-xx1nvIXK58YW91dkhhcEtLN00/edit?usp=sharing). Now I have downloaded the above mentioned amount of 299.354 GB, which translates to just 28.6% (299.354/1044.48*100) of my total possible usage on an Uncapped account, this amount would obviously decrease if I included uploads (but in my case I don’t use P2P, so it’s negligible).
Firstly - This tells me that if my usage @ 29%* of my total possible usage is having a detrimental effect on Telkom’s Network, what exactly is this network made of? - Two tin cans and some string?
Secondly – Telkom, seems to be throttling the connections really badly, to the extent that the connection is possibly unusable (according to a post above), this is an uncapped account and we’ve used a fraction of the total possible usage why is the throttling that draconian?
(1) Including, my uploads @ 10.24 GB.
*Based on the fact that other people on 4 Meg accounts have achieved usage in similar ranges, before being throttled.
Please let me know your thoughts, because I feel like I am wrong in some way.
It's not about what components are in the network, it's about what bandwidth actually costs. Even if we count *just* the IPC cost, your 4Mbps which you seem to think you are paying the full cost of, costs us about R2500. That doesn't include any local (off our own network) or international bandwidth, network equipment, traffic management platforms, provisioning and billing systems, or staff costs.
The recent article by Jan Vermeulen is quite well-researched (even if a bit biased for MWeb's specific situation), if you haven't read and understood it, you should.
If you are basing your complaints about throttling purely on MightyMuffinMan's description, and not your own experience, please note that we are investigating some issues which are unrelated to throttling which may be impacting MightyMuffinMan as well as Electric who was not throttled. (we have some capped users who reported a similar experience while they were in quota). Unfortunately we have some high priority work to be completed during this week (which should hopefully further improve experience), so I haven't had time to keep up-to-date with the investigation of that issue.
There is nothing different in implementation from the in the throttling from what people were paying R199/month for 2 years ago ...
It's not their network, it's their bottom line. These accounts and accounts from every single other ISP out there are priced below cost in order to gain economy of scale to make the business plan work, and need a lot of low usage clients to subside your 300+GB usage, to a point, then they apply AUP.
The recent article by Jan Vermeulen is quite well-researched (even if a bit biased for MWeb's specific situation), if you haven't read and understood it, you should.
Ok, as a student studying finance management I can appreciate that there are other costs to consider as you have mentioned. However the issue I have is that ISPs, not just Telkom Internet are offering uncapped accounts, which they can’t sustain because they need low end users to sustain “power users” like me, let’s remember that only a fraction of South Africa’s population have access to ADSL and even less, may use an uncapped account. Users have evolved, like myself from using 5 GBs of data a month to 300GB, for the same price as a 5 GB account in 2006/2007.
Do you not think it would be logical then to factor in the increased usage trends into the threshold calculation? (and possibly, overall product cost calculation) The reason why I mentioned the state of ADSL users in South Africa is that in the future, others might want uncapped internet access too, and based on the trend of peoples usage increasing, as more content is consumed on the internet (Netflix, Steam, Xbox Live, etc.) will this not further decrease the thresholds, assuming cetris parabis on the part of ISPs. What we can’t have is an operations manager lowering the thresholds every quarter, thereby increasing the bottom line substantially. What I take away from this experience is that these accounts (again, not just Ti) are not true "uncapped" they faux-uncapped accounts.
Also I haven’t experienced any throttling yet, so please excuse that point.
Are you indirectly saying Telkom Internet’s thresholds are better than MWeb![]()