Telkom: our pricing is competitive

Well, anyone who uses doctor and isn't a medical practitioner is a bit of a w@nker to begin with.

If he believes what he's claiming then he's a complete w@nker, if not he's just morally bankrupt.
 
Well, anyone who uses doctor and isn't a medical practitioner is a bit of a w@nker to begin with.

If he believes what he's claiming then he's a complete w@nker, if not he's just morally bankrupt.

:confused:

It's based on qualification - if you have a PhD then you're a doctor. The real question is where he bought his PhD from.
 
:confused:

It's based on qualification - if you have a PhD then you're a doctor. The real question is where he bought his PhD from.

I know that but when someone asks if there's a doctor in the house he's about as much use as he is to telecoms liberalisation.

He's basically just walking around demanding respect for his academic achievements. He is a w@nker.
 
My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C.
 
This just proves exactly how deep Telkom has its head up its own arse.
 
My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C.
 
My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C.
 
My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C.

My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C.

My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C.

There appears to be a glitch in the Matrix :p
 
My Telkom ADSL doesn't work often enough for me to get close to my cap. Just as well that I have a lot of Cell C. :D
 
they're only gaining more than they're loosing because they're such a bloody monopoly when it comes to fixed lines and neotel has failed to really make a dent in the market
 
MyBroadband questioned Armstrong as to why ADSL usage allowances (caps) did not increase by 90%

Armstrong explained that they are definitely not profiteering.
Dodge questions much?

“We win more customers than we lose,” said Armstrong as a way of proving that they are competitively priced and are not profiteering.
Kinda hard to lose customers if you have a monopoly...
 
operating in a competitive ADSL market with great success

Um, yea. Because I can get a line from someone else...
No matter the ISP, you have to pay for line rental from Telkom, which is the single biggest cost
 
MyBroadband questioned Armstrong as to why ADSL usage allowances (caps) did not increase by 90% since international bandwidth prices came down so significantly, and whether the company is therefore profiteering.

What rocket scientist asked this question? If I had a list of 1000 questions to ask Telkom this one wouldn't even make the list. Caps have increased, Mr Einstein, from 3gb to 5gb to 9gb. That's a 200% increase! But it is not even important, because data is subject to competition. Telkom's pricing in areas where there is competition is not in issue. The market forces their hand.

No the Question, and the ONLY question is why ADSL and line rentals, where they have a complete monopoly, are so freaking high, and without any shadow of a doubt, higher than anywhere else in the World. How can MyBB interview a Telkom honcho and not ask about the elephant in the room?

Flabbergasted, I am.
 
Where is the proof that Telkom is competitive? They must be smoking some strong stuff when they did their analysis.
 
Armstrong backed up his argument with two slides originating from 2009 research done by international research company Tariffica

:wtf:

* meh
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X