The Brexit Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont get what all the fuss is about. 51% of Voters decided that they would rather be unemployed than be part of the EU, so so be it :)
Ironic, considering a large number of those who voted Remain would rather be off at some random protest than actually making an living.

Tongue out of cheek, though, similar to how Trump became the US president, it was the often ignored, blue collar, hard working, council estate dwellers who got Leave over the finish line, I reckon.
 
Last edited:
Ironic, considering a large number of those who voted Remain would rather be off at some random protest than actually making an living.

Tongue out of cheek, though, similar to how Trump became the US president, it was the often ignored, blue collar, hard working, council estate dwellers who got Leave over the finish line, I reckon.

Those "hard working" chavs who live off welfare because they think they're too good for manual labour, you mean?
 
Those "hard working" chavs who live off welfare because they think they're too good for manual labour, you mean?
The 3 million or so people claiming unemployment benefits, you mean? Or pensioners and disabled people who get government grants?
 
The left cheering on a crooked billionaire hedge fund manager in his attempts to undermine a democratic mandate.

The Occupy Wall Street protest seems so very long ago........
 
The left cheering on a crooked billionaire hedge fund manager in his attempts to undermine a democratic mandate.

The Occupy Wall Street protest seems so very long ago........
What a wonderful open society, eh? ;)
 
The left cheering on a crooked billionaire hedge fund manager in his attempts to undermine a democratic mandate.

The Occupy Wall Street protest seems so very long ago........

He's not attempting to undermine a democratic mandate. Don't be foolish. He wants another referendum so it's still democratic. In fact, given the amount of information that has become available only after the vote it would be dereliction to democracy not to have another vote.
 
Funny how Rees Mogg is such a cheerleader for a total hard brexit, isn’t it?

Jacob Rees-Mogg is in line for a huge personal windfall when Britain exits the single market

The political motives for an exit from the single market were laid bare today after it was revealed that a prominent Brexiteer is also a major shareholder of an emerging markets investment firm.

Jacob Rees-Mogg is a long-term backer of investment management firm Somerset Capital, which has “9.6 billion dollars” under management according to its website.

The Leading Brexiteer recently ridiculed the idea of the UK staying in the single market and customs union after Brexit, joining other Eurosceptics calling for a “clean” separation with the EU so the UK has the freedom to strike new trade deals.

Moves to create barriers to trade with the EU would force UK companies to strike up deals elsewhere, directly profiting companies backing the emerging markets.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/n...l-windfall-britain-exits-single-market/07/02/
 
He's not attempting to undermine a democratic mandate. Don't be foolish. He wants another referendum so it's still democratic. In fact, given the amount of information that has become available only after the vote it would be dereliction to democracy not to have another vote.
Democracy is not the act of re-voting until you get the result you wanted. There was a referendum, it has an outcome, end of story.
 
Last edited:
What a wonderful open society, eh? ;)

I also seem to recall them rallying against mega wealthy individuals influencing politics with their billions. Again this was long ago though.
 
Democracy is not the act of re-voting until you get the result you wanted. There was a referendum, it has an outcome, end of story.

You mean like all those outcomes of Obama's that Trump reversed when he got into office...? Outcomes in democracy are seldom permanent.

If the will of the people now is different to what it was then, going through with a lengthy and costly process that people have since changed their minds about seems a bit silly..
 
Last edited:
You mean like all those outcomes of Obama's that Trump reversed when he got into office...? Outcomes in democracy are seldom permanent.
We're talking about a vote here, just like the US won't have another presidential election until 2020, the deluded bremoaners should expect not to have another referendum until brexit at least has been enacted.
 
Democracy is not the act of re-voting until you get the result you wanted. There was a referendum, it has an outcome, end of story.

Brexit referendums every 6 months because people change their minds, new information comes to light and stuff.
 
Brexit referendums every 6 months because people change their minds, new information comes to light and stuff.

While we're at it: better reduce the maximum allowable presidential term to 6 months as well. People might've changed their minds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X